El ámbito de environmental law is undergoing significant transformations as new challenges arise from climate change, technological advancements, and evolving societal expectations. Climate litigation has emerged as a powerful tool for addressing environmental concerns, with an increasing number of cases being filed worldwide. This article examines the key trends and emerging issues in environmental law and climate litigation, exploring their implications for governments, corporations, and individuals.
One of the most prominent trends in recent years has been the rise of climate change lawsuits. These cases seek to hold governments and corporations accountable for their contributions to global warming and their failure to take adequate action to mitigate its effects. The number of climate-related lawsuits has grown substantially, with over 230 new cases filed in 2023 alone. These cases span a wide range of legal arguments, from constitutional claims to human rights violations.
A significant development in climate litigation has been the emergence of “corporate framework” cases. These lawsuits aim to compel companies to align their policies and governance processes with climate goals. For instance, the landmark case of Milieudefensie v. Shell in the Netherlands ordered Royal Dutch Shell to reduce its carbon emissions by 45% by 2030 compared to 2019 levels. While this case is currently under appeal, it represents a groundbreaking approach to holding corporations accountable for their climate impacts.
Another emerging trend is the increase in “climate-washing” cases. These lawsuits target companies for making misleading claims about their environmental credentials or the sustainability of their products. In 2023, 47 such cases were filed, bringing the total number of recorded climate-washing cases to over 140. Notably, these cases have had a high success rate, with more than 70% of completed cases decided in favor of the claimants.
The concept of “polluter pays” has gained traction in climate litigation. Currently, more than 30 cases worldwide are seeking to hold companies accountable for climate-related harm allegedly caused by their greenhouse gas emissions. These cases often involve complex questions of causation and attribution, as plaintiffs must demonstrate a direct link between a company’s emissions and specific climate impacts.
An emerging category of climate litigation is “transition risk” cases. These lawsuits target corporate directors and officers for their management of climate-related risks. For example, shareholders of the Polish energy company Enea approved a decision to bring a case against former directors for planned investments in a new coal power plant. This type of litigation highlights the growing expectation that corporate leaders must consider climate risks in their decision-making processes.
La intersección de environmental justice and climate litigation is another area of increasing focus. Advocates are using the legal system to address environmental inequalities and advocate for marginalized communities disproportionately impacted by pollution and climate change. These cases often challenge traditional practices and policies, shedding light on the intersectionality of environmental and social justice issues.
Technological advancements are playing a crucial role in shaping environmental litigation. Remote sensing, data analytics, and machine learning provide powerful tools for gathering evidence and supporting legal arguments. Satellite imagery, for instance, can be used to track deforestation, monitor air pollution, or detect illegal waste dumping. These technologies enhance attorneys’ ability to address complex environmental disputes and provide more robust evidence in court.
The issue of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) has emerged as a significant concern in environmental law. Often referred to as “forever chemicals” due to their persistence in the environment, PFAS have been linked to various health problems. Litigation related to PFAS contamination is on the rise, with cases targeting manufacturers, users of PFAS-containing products, and even government agencies responsible for regulating these substances.
Biodiversity protection is increasingly intertwined with climate litigation. As the links between climate change and biodiversity loss become clearer, legal actions are being brought to protect ecosystems and species threatened by global warming. For example, cases have been filed to protect coral reefs from climate-induced bleaching or to preserve habitats for endangered species affected by changing climate patterns.
El concepto de ecocide – severe and widespread damage to the environment – is gaining traction in international environmental law. Efforts are underway to have ecocide recognized as an international crime, which could potentially lead to criminal prosecutions for the most egregious acts of environmental destruction. This development could significantly impact future environmental litigation, providing a new avenue for holding individuals and corporations accountable for severe environmental harm.
Climate adaptation is emerging as a critical issue in environmental law and litigation. As the impacts of climate change become more severe and frequent, questions of liability and responsibility for adaptation measures are arising. Cases are being brought against governments and private entities for failing to adequately prepare for climate impacts, such as sea-level rise, increased flooding, or more intense wildfires.
El papel de financial institutions in climate change is coming under increased scrutiny. Lawsuits are being filed against banks, investment firms, and pension funds for their financing of fossil fuel projects or failure to adequately consider climate risks in their investment decisions. These cases often argue that such actions constitute a breach of fiduciary duty or violate various financial regulations.
International climate agreements, such as the Paris Agreement, are playing an increasingly important role in climate litigation. Plaintiffs are using these agreements as a basis for legal action, arguing that governments and corporations are failing to meet their commitments under international law. This trend highlights the growing intersection between international environmental law and domestic legal systems.
El concepto de climate rights is gaining traction in legal discourse. Some jurisdictions have recognized a constitutional right to a healthy environment, which is being used as a basis for climate litigation. For example, in the Netherlands, the Urgenda case successfully argued that the government’s inadequate climate action violated citizens’ rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.
Environmental impact assessments (EIAs) are becoming a focal point in climate litigation. Plaintiffs are challenging the adequacy of EIAs that fail to fully consider climate impacts or greenhouse gas emissions. These cases often seek to block or modify projects that are deemed incompatible with climate goals.
The issue of climate refugees is emerging as a complex challenge for international law. As climate change leads to displacement of populations due to rising sea levels, desertification, or extreme weather events, questions of legal status and responsibility for these displaced persons are arising. This issue intersects with human rights law, immigration law, and international environmental law.
Circular economy principles are increasingly being incorporated into environmental regulations and litigation. Cases are being brought to enforce or expand regulations related to waste reduction, recycling, and product lifecycle management. This trend reflects a growing recognition of the need to move away from linear “take-make-dispose” economic models towards more sustainable, circular approaches.
El concepto de environmental personhood – granting legal rights to natural entities such as rivers, forests, or ecosystems – is gaining ground in some jurisdictions. This novel legal approach could potentially open new avenues for environmental protection and litigation, allowing natural entities to be represented in court.
Geoengineering and its potential impacts are emerging as a new frontier in environmental law. As proposals for large-scale interventions to counteract climate change gain attention, questions of regulation, liability, and international governance are arising. Future litigation may address the legality and potential consequences of geoengineering projects.
En transformación digital of environmental monitoring and enforcement is reshaping the landscape of environmental law. Blockchain technology, for instance, is being explored as a tool for enhancing transparency and traceability in environmental compliance. This could potentially lead to new forms of evidence and new legal challenges in environmental cases.
Environmental crime is receiving increased attention from law enforcement and prosecutors. Cases involving illegal logging, wildlife trafficking, and toxic waste dumping are being pursued more aggressively, often with international cooperation. This trend reflects a growing recognition of the serious nature of environmental crimes and their links to other criminal activities.
El concepto de intergenerational equity is gaining prominence in climate litigation. Cases are being brought on behalf of future generations, arguing that current inaction on climate change violates the rights of those who will inherit the consequences. This approach raises complex legal questions about standing and the temporal scope of legal rights and responsibilities.
Corporate supply chain liability is emerging as a significant issue in environmental law. Companies are increasingly being held accountable not just for their direct environmental impacts, but also for the impacts of their suppliers and contractors. This trend is driving the development of more comprehensive environmental due diligence practices and could lead to expanded corporate liability in future litigation.
La intersección de artificial intelligence (AI) and environmental law is an emerging area of interest. AI is being used to predict environmental impacts, optimize resource use, and enhance environmental monitoring. However, the use of AI in environmental decision-making also raises legal and ethical questions that may become the subject of future litigation.
Environmental insurance is evolving in response to changing climate risks. Litigation related to environmental insurance claims is likely to increase as the impacts of climate change become more severe and frequent. This could include disputes over coverage for climate-related damages, as well as cases challenging the adequacy of insurers’ consideration of climate risks in their underwriting practices.
El concepto de just transition is gaining prominence in environmental law and policy. This approach emphasizes the need to ensure that the shift to a low-carbon economy is fair and inclusive, particularly for workers and communities dependent on fossil fuel industries. Litigation may arise around the implementation of just transition policies or the failure to adequately address the social impacts of climate action.
Environmental human rights defenders are facing increasing threats in many parts of the world, leading to calls for stronger legal protections. Cases are being brought to defend the rights of environmental activists and to hold accountable those who threaten or harm them. This trend highlights the growing recognition of the crucial role that environmental defenders play in protecting ecosystems and combating climate change.
En precautionary principle – the idea that lack of scientific certainty should not prevent action to prevent potential environmental harm – is being invoked more frequently in environmental litigation. Cases are challenging government and corporate actions that fail to adequately consider potential long-term environmental impacts, even in the face of scientific uncertainty.
Environmental taxation is emerging as a key tool in climate policy, but it is also generating legal challenges. Litigation may arise over the implementation of carbon taxes, border carbon adjustments, or other environmental fiscal measures. These cases often involve complex questions of international trade law, tax law, and environmental law.
El concepto de nature-based solutions to climate change is gaining traction in environmental policy and law. These approaches, which involve working with nature to address societal challenges, are being incorporated into climate adaptation and mitigation strategies. Future litigation may address the effectiveness, implementation, or unintended consequences of nature-based solutions.
Space debris and its environmental impacts are emerging as a new frontier in environmental law. As space activities increase, questions of liability for orbital debris, environmental impacts of space launches, and the protection of the space environment are arising. This area intersects with international space law and may lead to novel forms of environmental litigation in the future.
En right to repair movement is gaining momentum, with implications for environmental law and litigation. Cases are being brought to challenge practices that limit the repairability of products, arguing that such practices contribute to electronic waste and resource depletion. This trend reflects growing concern about the environmental impacts of planned obsolescence and disposable consumer goods.
Environmental democracy principles, including access to information, public participation in decision-making, and access to justice in environmental matters, are being strengthened in many jurisdictions. Litigation is being used to enforce these rights and to challenge decisions made without adequate public consultation or transparency.
El concepto de ecological debt – the idea that industrialized countries owe a debt to developing countries for their historical overuse of global environmental resources – is gaining attention in international environmental law. While not yet the subject of major litigation, this concept could potentially influence future climate negotiations and possibly lead to novel forms of international environmental claims.
Sustainable finance regulations are evolving rapidly, with potential implications for environmental litigation. Cases may arise challenging the adequacy of corporate climate-related financial disclosures or the alignment of financial products with sustainability claims. This trend reflects the growing recognition of the crucial role that the financial sector plays in addressing environmental challenges.
En rights of nature movement is gaining ground in some jurisdictions, with rivers, forests, and other natural entities being granted legal personhood. This novel legal approach could potentially open new avenues for environmental protection and litigation, allowing natural entities to be represented in court and potentially sue for damages.
In conclusion, the field of environmental law and climate litigation is rapidly evolving in response to the urgent challenges posed by climate change and environmental degradation. From corporate accountability and climate rights to technological innovations and novel legal concepts, the landscape is becoming increasingly complex and multifaceted. As these trends continue to develop, they will shape the future of environmental protection and sustainable development, influencing policy, corporate behavior, and individual actions in the years to come.
Website citations:
- https://www.eyeonesg.com/2024/07/climate-litigation-the-grantham-research-institute-on-climate-change-and-the-environment-publishes-its-2024-global-trends-in-climate-litigation-report/
- https://www.august-law.com/emerging-trends-in-environmental-litigation-what-attorneys-should-know/
- https://www.vermontlaw.edu/news-and-events/top-10-environmental-issues-watch-in-2024-identified-vermont
- https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/global-trends-in-climate-change-litigation-2024-snapshot/
- https://earth.org/explainer-climate-litigation-trends-and-impact/
- https://www.ncelenviro.org/articles/2024-legislative-session-recap/
- https://natlawreview.com/article/meeting-new-challenges-environmental-energy-and-esg-issues-watch-2024
- https://www.ngfs.net/sites/default/files/medias/documents/ngfs_report-on-climate-related-litigation-recent-trends-and-developments.pdf
Español de México 
English
What are the emerging issues in environmental law and climate litigation?
Inicio " Blog " Derecho Civil " Derecho medioambiental " What are the emerging issues in environmental law and climate litigation?
Video Categories
El ámbito de environmental law is undergoing significant transformations as new challenges arise from climate change, technological advancements, and evolving societal expectations. Climate litigation has emerged as a powerful tool for addressing environmental concerns, with an increasing number of cases being filed worldwide. This article examines the key trends and emerging issues in environmental law and climate litigation, exploring their implications for governments, corporations, and individuals.
One of the most prominent trends in recent years has been the rise of climate change lawsuits. These cases seek to hold governments and corporations accountable for their contributions to global warming and their failure to take adequate action to mitigate its effects. The number of climate-related lawsuits has grown substantially, with over 230 new cases filed in 2023 alone. These cases span a wide range of legal arguments, from constitutional claims to human rights violations.
A significant development in climate litigation has been the emergence of “corporate framework” cases. These lawsuits aim to compel companies to align their policies and governance processes with climate goals. For instance, the landmark case of Milieudefensie v. Shell in the Netherlands ordered Royal Dutch Shell to reduce its carbon emissions by 45% by 2030 compared to 2019 levels. While this case is currently under appeal, it represents a groundbreaking approach to holding corporations accountable for their climate impacts.
Another emerging trend is the increase in “climate-washing” cases. These lawsuits target companies for making misleading claims about their environmental credentials or the sustainability of their products. In 2023, 47 such cases were filed, bringing the total number of recorded climate-washing cases to over 140. Notably, these cases have had a high success rate, with more than 70% of completed cases decided in favor of the claimants.
The concept of “polluter pays” has gained traction in climate litigation. Currently, more than 30 cases worldwide are seeking to hold companies accountable for climate-related harm allegedly caused by their greenhouse gas emissions. These cases often involve complex questions of causation and attribution, as plaintiffs must demonstrate a direct link between a company’s emissions and specific climate impacts.
An emerging category of climate litigation is “transition risk” cases. These lawsuits target corporate directors and officers for their management of climate-related risks. For example, shareholders of the Polish energy company Enea approved a decision to bring a case against former directors for planned investments in a new coal power plant. This type of litigation highlights the growing expectation that corporate leaders must consider climate risks in their decision-making processes.
La intersección de environmental justice and climate litigation is another area of increasing focus. Advocates are using the legal system to address environmental inequalities and advocate for marginalized communities disproportionately impacted by pollution and climate change. These cases often challenge traditional practices and policies, shedding light on the intersectionality of environmental and social justice issues.
Technological advancements are playing a crucial role in shaping environmental litigation. Remote sensing, data analytics, and machine learning provide powerful tools for gathering evidence and supporting legal arguments. Satellite imagery, for instance, can be used to track deforestation, monitor air pollution, or detect illegal waste dumping. These technologies enhance attorneys’ ability to address complex environmental disputes and provide more robust evidence in court.
The issue of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) has emerged as a significant concern in environmental law. Often referred to as “forever chemicals” due to their persistence in the environment, PFAS have been linked to various health problems. Litigation related to PFAS contamination is on the rise, with cases targeting manufacturers, users of PFAS-containing products, and even government agencies responsible for regulating these substances.
Biodiversity protection is increasingly intertwined with climate litigation. As the links between climate change and biodiversity loss become clearer, legal actions are being brought to protect ecosystems and species threatened by global warming. For example, cases have been filed to protect coral reefs from climate-induced bleaching or to preserve habitats for endangered species affected by changing climate patterns.
El concepto de ecocide – severe and widespread damage to the environment – is gaining traction in international environmental law. Efforts are underway to have ecocide recognized as an international crime, which could potentially lead to criminal prosecutions for the most egregious acts of environmental destruction. This development could significantly impact future environmental litigation, providing a new avenue for holding individuals and corporations accountable for severe environmental harm.
Climate adaptation is emerging as a critical issue in environmental law and litigation. As the impacts of climate change become more severe and frequent, questions of liability and responsibility for adaptation measures are arising. Cases are being brought against governments and private entities for failing to adequately prepare for climate impacts, such as sea-level rise, increased flooding, or more intense wildfires.
El papel de financial institutions in climate change is coming under increased scrutiny. Lawsuits are being filed against banks, investment firms, and pension funds for their financing of fossil fuel projects or failure to adequately consider climate risks in their investment decisions. These cases often argue that such actions constitute a breach of fiduciary duty or violate various financial regulations.
International climate agreements, such as the Paris Agreement, are playing an increasingly important role in climate litigation. Plaintiffs are using these agreements as a basis for legal action, arguing that governments and corporations are failing to meet their commitments under international law. This trend highlights the growing intersection between international environmental law and domestic legal systems.
El concepto de climate rights is gaining traction in legal discourse. Some jurisdictions have recognized a constitutional right to a healthy environment, which is being used as a basis for climate litigation. For example, in the Netherlands, the Urgenda case successfully argued that the government’s inadequate climate action violated citizens’ rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.
Environmental impact assessments (EIAs) are becoming a focal point in climate litigation. Plaintiffs are challenging the adequacy of EIAs that fail to fully consider climate impacts or greenhouse gas emissions. These cases often seek to block or modify projects that are deemed incompatible with climate goals.
The issue of climate refugees is emerging as a complex challenge for international law. As climate change leads to displacement of populations due to rising sea levels, desertification, or extreme weather events, questions of legal status and responsibility for these displaced persons are arising. This issue intersects with human rights law, immigration law, and international environmental law.
Circular economy principles are increasingly being incorporated into environmental regulations and litigation. Cases are being brought to enforce or expand regulations related to waste reduction, recycling, and product lifecycle management. This trend reflects a growing recognition of the need to move away from linear “take-make-dispose” economic models towards more sustainable, circular approaches.
El concepto de environmental personhood – granting legal rights to natural entities such as rivers, forests, or ecosystems – is gaining ground in some jurisdictions. This novel legal approach could potentially open new avenues for environmental protection and litigation, allowing natural entities to be represented in court.
Geoengineering and its potential impacts are emerging as a new frontier in environmental law. As proposals for large-scale interventions to counteract climate change gain attention, questions of regulation, liability, and international governance are arising. Future litigation may address the legality and potential consequences of geoengineering projects.
En transformación digital of environmental monitoring and enforcement is reshaping the landscape of environmental law. Blockchain technology, for instance, is being explored as a tool for enhancing transparency and traceability in environmental compliance. This could potentially lead to new forms of evidence and new legal challenges in environmental cases.
Environmental crime is receiving increased attention from law enforcement and prosecutors. Cases involving illegal logging, wildlife trafficking, and toxic waste dumping are being pursued more aggressively, often with international cooperation. This trend reflects a growing recognition of the serious nature of environmental crimes and their links to other criminal activities.
El concepto de intergenerational equity is gaining prominence in climate litigation. Cases are being brought on behalf of future generations, arguing that current inaction on climate change violates the rights of those who will inherit the consequences. This approach raises complex legal questions about standing and the temporal scope of legal rights and responsibilities.
Corporate supply chain liability is emerging as a significant issue in environmental law. Companies are increasingly being held accountable not just for their direct environmental impacts, but also for the impacts of their suppliers and contractors. This trend is driving the development of more comprehensive environmental due diligence practices and could lead to expanded corporate liability in future litigation.
La intersección de artificial intelligence (AI) and environmental law is an emerging area of interest. AI is being used to predict environmental impacts, optimize resource use, and enhance environmental monitoring. However, the use of AI in environmental decision-making also raises legal and ethical questions that may become the subject of future litigation.
Environmental insurance is evolving in response to changing climate risks. Litigation related to environmental insurance claims is likely to increase as the impacts of climate change become more severe and frequent. This could include disputes over coverage for climate-related damages, as well as cases challenging the adequacy of insurers’ consideration of climate risks in their underwriting practices.
El concepto de just transition is gaining prominence in environmental law and policy. This approach emphasizes the need to ensure that the shift to a low-carbon economy is fair and inclusive, particularly for workers and communities dependent on fossil fuel industries. Litigation may arise around the implementation of just transition policies or the failure to adequately address the social impacts of climate action.
Environmental human rights defenders are facing increasing threats in many parts of the world, leading to calls for stronger legal protections. Cases are being brought to defend the rights of environmental activists and to hold accountable those who threaten or harm them. This trend highlights the growing recognition of the crucial role that environmental defenders play in protecting ecosystems and combating climate change.
En precautionary principle – the idea that lack of scientific certainty should not prevent action to prevent potential environmental harm – is being invoked more frequently in environmental litigation. Cases are challenging government and corporate actions that fail to adequately consider potential long-term environmental impacts, even in the face of scientific uncertainty.
Environmental taxation is emerging as a key tool in climate policy, but it is also generating legal challenges. Litigation may arise over the implementation of carbon taxes, border carbon adjustments, or other environmental fiscal measures. These cases often involve complex questions of international trade law, tax law, and environmental law.
El concepto de nature-based solutions to climate change is gaining traction in environmental policy and law. These approaches, which involve working with nature to address societal challenges, are being incorporated into climate adaptation and mitigation strategies. Future litigation may address the effectiveness, implementation, or unintended consequences of nature-based solutions.
Space debris and its environmental impacts are emerging as a new frontier in environmental law. As space activities increase, questions of liability for orbital debris, environmental impacts of space launches, and the protection of the space environment are arising. This area intersects with international space law and may lead to novel forms of environmental litigation in the future.
En right to repair movement is gaining momentum, with implications for environmental law and litigation. Cases are being brought to challenge practices that limit the repairability of products, arguing that such practices contribute to electronic waste and resource depletion. This trend reflects growing concern about the environmental impacts of planned obsolescence and disposable consumer goods.
Environmental democracy principles, including access to information, public participation in decision-making, and access to justice in environmental matters, are being strengthened in many jurisdictions. Litigation is being used to enforce these rights and to challenge decisions made without adequate public consultation or transparency.
El concepto de ecological debt – the idea that industrialized countries owe a debt to developing countries for their historical overuse of global environmental resources – is gaining attention in international environmental law. While not yet the subject of major litigation, this concept could potentially influence future climate negotiations and possibly lead to novel forms of international environmental claims.
Sustainable finance regulations are evolving rapidly, with potential implications for environmental litigation. Cases may arise challenging the adequacy of corporate climate-related financial disclosures or the alignment of financial products with sustainability claims. This trend reflects the growing recognition of the crucial role that the financial sector plays in addressing environmental challenges.
En rights of nature movement is gaining ground in some jurisdictions, with rivers, forests, and other natural entities being granted legal personhood. This novel legal approach could potentially open new avenues for environmental protection and litigation, allowing natural entities to be represented in court and potentially sue for damages.
In conclusion, the field of environmental law and climate litigation is rapidly evolving in response to the urgent challenges posed by climate change and environmental degradation. From corporate accountability and climate rights to technological innovations and novel legal concepts, the landscape is becoming increasingly complex and multifaceted. As these trends continue to develop, they will shape the future of environmental protection and sustainable development, influencing policy, corporate behavior, and individual actions in the years to come.
Website citations:
Suscríbase a nuestro boletín para actualizaciones
Acerca de Attorneys.Media
Attorneys.Media es una innovadora plataforma de medios de comunicación diseñada para salvar la distancia entre los profesionales del Derecho y el público. Aprovecha el poder de los contenidos de vídeo para desmitificar temas jurídicos complejos, facilitando a los particulares la comprensión de diversos aspectos del Derecho. Mediante entrevistas con abogados especializados en distintos campos, la plataforma ofrece valiosas perspectivas sobre cuestiones jurídicas tanto civiles como penales.
El modelo de negocio de Attorneys.Media no sólo mejora el conocimiento público de los asuntos jurídicos, sino que también ofrece a los abogados una oportunidad única de mostrar su experiencia y conectar con clientes potenciales. Las entrevistas en vídeo cubren un amplio espectro de temas jurídicos, ofreciendo a los espectadores una comprensión más profunda de los procesos legales, derechos y consideraciones dentro de diferentes contextos.
Para quienes buscan información jurídica, Attorneys.Media constituye un recurso dinámico y accesible. El énfasis en los contenidos de vídeo responde a la creciente preferencia por el aprendizaje visual y auditivo, haciendo que la información jurídica compleja sea más digerible para el público en general.
Al mismo tiempo, para los profesionales del Derecho, la plataforma ofrece una valiosa vía de visibilidad y compromiso con un público más amplio, ampliando potencialmente su base de clientes.
De forma única, Attorneys.Media representa un enfoque moderno para facilitar la educación y el conocimiento de cuestiones jurídicas dentro del sector público y la posterior consulta legal con abogados locales.