The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) stands as a cornerstone of government transparency in the United States, providing citizens with a powerful tool to access information about the inner workings of federal agencies. Enacted in 1966 and taking effect on July 5, 1967, FOIA establishes a legal framework that requires federal agencies to disclose records upon request, unless the information falls under one of nine specific exemptions. This legislation has played a crucial role in promoting openness, accountability, and informed citizenship by allowing individuals, organizations, and media outlets to scrutinize government activities and decision-making processes.
At its core, FOIA embodies the principle that an informed citizenry is essential to the functioning of a democratic society. By granting the public the right to request and obtain government records, FOIA serves as a check against corruption and enables citizens to hold their elected officials and government agencies accountable. This transparency mechanism has been instrumental in uncovering important information on a wide range of issues, from public safety concerns to national security matters, and has contributed significantly to public discourse and policy debates.
The impact of FOIA on government transparency is multifaceted and far-reaching. One of the primary ways FOIA promotes openness is through its proactive disclosure requirements. Under FOIA, federal agencies are obligated to automatically publish certain categories of information in the Federal Register and on their websites, without waiting for specific requests. This includes descriptions of agency organizations, functions, and procedures; substantive agency rules; and statements of general agency policy. Additionally, agencies must make available for public inspection final opinions and orders rendered in the adjudication of cases, specific policy statements, and certain administrative staff manuals. This proactive approach ensures that a significant amount of government information is readily accessible to the public, fostering a culture of openness and reducing the need for formal FOIA requests.
Beyond proactive disclosure, FOIA’s request-based system allows individuals to seek specific records that may not be publicly available. This aspect of the law is particularly powerful, as it enables citizens to delve into areas of government activity that might otherwise remain hidden from public view. The process of making a FOIA request is designed to be accessible to all, regardless of citizenship status or purpose. Any person can submit a request to a federal agency, describing the records they seek with reasonable specificity. Agencies are then required to conduct a thorough search for the requested records and provide a response within 20 business days, although extensions are possible in certain circumstances.
The broad scope of FOIA’s applicability is another key factor in its effectiveness as a transparency tool. The act covers records held by executive branch agencies, including departments, agencies, and offices of the federal government. This wide-ranging coverage ensures that virtually every aspect of federal government operations is subject to public scrutiny. From environmental protection policies to law enforcement activities, FOIA provides a mechanism for shedding light on diverse areas of government function.
However, it’s important to note that FOIA’s promotion of transparency is not absolute. The act includes nine exemptions that allow agencies to withhold certain types of information. These exemptions are designed to balance the public’s right to know with other important interests, such as national security, personal privacy, and law enforcement effectiveness. For example, Exemption 1 protects classified national defense and foreign policy information, while Exemption 6 shields personal privacy information. While these exemptions are necessary to protect legitimate government and private interests, they also represent potential limitations on transparency. The application of these exemptions is often a point of contention and legal challenge, as requesters and agencies may disagree on whether specific information should be released or withheld.
The role of FOIA in promoting government transparency extends beyond mere access to information. The act has fostered a culture of openness and accountability within federal agencies. Knowing that their actions and decisions may be subject to public scrutiny through FOIA requests, government officials are often more mindful of their responsibilities and the potential for public oversight. This awareness can lead to more careful decision-making processes and better record-keeping practices, ultimately contributing to more transparent and responsible governance.
FOIA has also played a crucial role in investigative journalism and public interest research. Journalists and researchers frequently use FOIA requests to uncover important stories and conduct in-depth investigations into government activities. This has led to numerous exposés of government misconduct, policy failures, and hidden information of public interest. For example, FOIA requests have been instrumental in revealing details about environmental hazards, government surveillance programs, and the treatment of detainees in military facilities. By providing access to primary source documents and data, FOIA enables journalists and researchers to present well-substantiated reports to the public, fostering informed debate on critical issues.
The impact of FOIA on government transparency is not limited to the federal level. Many states have enacted their own versions of freedom of information laws, often modeled after the federal FOIA. These state-level laws extend the principles of government transparency to state and local agencies, creating a comprehensive framework for public access to government information across all levels of governance in the United States. This cascading effect of FOIA principles has significantly expanded the scope of government transparency nationwide.
In recent years, technological advancements have enhanced FOIA’s effectiveness in promoting transparency. The advent of digital record-keeping and the internet has made it easier for agencies to store, search, and disseminate information. Many agencies now provide online FOIA request portals, allowing for more efficient submission and tracking of requests. Additionally, the E-FOIA amendments of 1996 required agencies to make certain types of records available electronically, further expanding public access to government information. These technological improvements have not only made the FOIA process more accessible but have also enabled agencies to handle a larger volume of requests more efficiently.
Despite its many successes, FOIA faces ongoing challenges in fully realizing its potential for promoting government transparency. One significant issue is the backlog of FOIA requests that many agencies face. The high volume of requests, combined with limited resources and complex review processes, often leads to delays in response times that can extend well beyond the statutory 20-day limit. These backlogs can significantly impede the timely release of information, potentially diminishing FOIA’s effectiveness as a tool for transparency and accountability.
Another challenge is the interpretation and application of FOIA exemptions. While exemptions are necessary to protect certain legitimate interests, there is ongoing debate about their scope and proper use. Critics argue that some agencies apply exemptions too broadly, using them to withhold information that should be public. This has led to numerous legal challenges and calls for reform to ensure that exemptions are not used to unnecessarily restrict access to information.
The issue of over-classification of government documents also poses a challenge to FOIA’s transparency goals. When information is classified, it becomes subject to FOIA’s national security exemption, potentially shielding it from public view for extended periods. Concerns have been raised about the overuse of classification, which can limit the amount of information available through FOIA requests and hinder public understanding of government activities, particularly in areas related to national security and foreign policy.
To address these challenges and enhance FOIA’s effectiveness, there have been several legislative updates and policy initiatives over the years. The OPEN Government Act of 2007 introduced several reforms, including the creation of the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) to mediate disputes between requesters and agencies, and the establishment of tracking numbers for FOIA requests. More recently, the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016 codified the “presumption of openness” principle, requiring agencies to release information unless there is a foreseeable harm or legal requirement to withhold it. This act also limited the use of Exemption 5 (deliberative process privilege) for records more than 25 years old and mandated the creation of a single FOIA request portal for all agencies.
The role of the judiciary in interpreting and enforcing FOIA has been crucial in shaping its impact on government transparency. Courts have played a significant role in defining the scope of FOIA exemptions, establishing standards for agency searches, and determining the adequacy of agency responses to FOIA requests. Judicial review provides an important check on agency discretion and helps ensure that FOIA’s transparency mandates are properly implemented. Notable court decisions have expanded public access to information in various areas, from environmental data to law enforcement records.
One area where FOIA has had a particularly significant impact on transparency is in the realm of protección del medio ambiente. Environmental groups and concerned citizens have frequently used FOIA to obtain information about pollution levels, enforcement actions, and policy decisions affecting public health and natural resources. This access to information has been crucial in holding polluters accountable and pushing for stronger environmental regulations. For example, FOIA requests have revealed details about water contamination issues, the environmental impacts of energy projects, and the influence of industry lobbying on environmental policy decisions.
FOIA has also been instrumental in shedding light on government surveillance programs and national security activities. While national security concerns often lead to information being withheld under FOIA exemptions, successful requests and subsequent litigation have revealed important details about controversial programs. This has included information about the NSA’s surveillance activities, the use of drones in military operations, and the treatment of detainees in facilities like Guantanamo Bay. These disclosures have sparked crucial public debates about privacy, civil liberties, and the balance between security and transparency.
In the realm of public health, FOIA has played a vital role in uncovering information about food safety, drug approvals, and healthcare policies. Journalists and advocacy groups have used FOIA requests to investigate issues such as the safety of medical devices, the approval process for pharmaceuticals, and government responses to public health crises. During the COVID-19 pandemic, FOIA requests have been crucial in obtaining data on infection rates, testing availability, and vaccine distribution, contributing to public understanding and oversight of the government’s pandemic response.
The impact of FOIA on financial transparency and accountability in government spending has been substantial. FOIA requests have been used to uncover details about government contracts, subsidies, and the use of taxpayer funds. This transparency has been crucial in identifying potential waste, fraud, and abuse in government spending. For instance, FOIA requests have revealed information about questionable government contracts, excessive spending on conferences and travel, and the misuse of funds in various federal programs.
FOIA’s role in promoting transparency extends to issues of civil rights and social justice. The act has been used to obtain records related to law enforcement practices, immigration policies, and discrimination cases. This information has been crucial in documenting patterns of misconduct, challenging discriminatory policies, and advocating for reforms. For example, FOIA requests have been instrumental in uncovering information about racial profiling in law enforcement, conditions in immigration detention centers, and the implementation of controversial policies like travel bans.
The international influence of FOIA is also worth noting. The United States’ FOIA has served as a model for similar laws in many other countries, contributing to a global movement towards greater government transparency. As of 2024, over 100 countries have enacted some form of freedom of information legislation, often drawing inspiration from the U.S. FOIA. This global spread of transparency laws has had a significant impact on international governance, facilitating greater accountability and citizen participation worldwide.
Despite its many successes, FOIA continues to evolve in response to changing technologies, government practices, and public expectations. One ongoing challenge is adapting FOIA to the digital age, where government communications and record-keeping increasingly occur through emails, instant messaging, and other electronic formats. Ensuring that these new forms of communication are properly preserved and accessible under FOIA is crucial for maintaining transparency in the modern era.
Another area of ongoing development is the relationship between FOIA and privacy concerns, particularly in light of advances in data collection and analysis. As government agencies collect and store more personal data, balancing the public’s right to know with individual privacy rights becomes increasingly complex. This tension has led to debates about how to apply FOIA’s privacy exemptions in the context of large datasets and digital records.
The role of FOIA in promoting transparency in government contracting and public-private partnerships is also an area of growing importance. As governments increasingly rely on private sector partners to deliver public services, ensuring transparency in these arrangements becomes crucial. FOIA requests have been used to scrutinize government contracts, revealing important information about costs, performance metrics, and potential conflicts of interest.
Looking to the future, there are ongoing discussions about potential reforms to further strengthen FOIA’s effectiveness in promoting government transparency. Proposals include streamlining the request process, increasing funding for FOIA offices to address backlogs, enhancing penalties for non-compliance, and expanding the scope of proactive disclosures. There are also calls for better integration of FOIA principles into government record-keeping practices from the outset, to facilitate easier and more comprehensive responses to information requests.
In conclusion, the Freedom of Information Act has been a powerful force for promoting transparency in government since its inception. By providing a legal mechanism for public access to government records, FOIA has enabled citizens, journalists, and organizations to scrutinize government activities, uncover important information, and hold officials accountable. While challenges remain in its implementation and there is ongoing debate about its scope and application, FOIA continues to play a crucial role in fostering an open and accountable democracy. As government practices and technologies evolve, the principles embodied in FOIA remain essential for ensuring that the public’s right to know is protected and that transparency remains a cornerstone of democratic governance in the United States.
Fuentes:
- https://www.foia.gov/faq.html
- https://www.justice.gov/oip/doj-guide-freedom-information-act-0
- https://www.gao.gov/blog/freedom-information-act-how-open-public-access-government-data
- https://www.eff.org/issues/transparency/foia
- https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/freedom_of_information_act_(foia)
Citations:
[1] https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46238
[2] https://epic.org/issues/open-government/foia/
[3] https://theconversation.com/growing-secrecy-limits-government-accountability-221553
[4] https://www.dea.gov/foia/about-foia
[5] https://www.justice.gov/archive/oip/foia_guide09/introduction.pdf
[6] https://www.gao.gov/blog/foia-backlogs-hinder-government-transparency-and-accountability
Español de México 
English
How does the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) promote transparency in government?
Inicio " Blog " Derecho Civil " Legislación federal " How does the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) promote transparency in government?
Video Categories
The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) stands as a cornerstone of government transparency in the United States, providing citizens with a powerful tool to access information about the inner workings of federal agencies. Enacted in 1966 and taking effect on July 5, 1967, FOIA establishes a legal framework that requires federal agencies to disclose records upon request, unless the information falls under one of nine specific exemptions. This legislation has played a crucial role in promoting openness, accountability, and informed citizenship by allowing individuals, organizations, and media outlets to scrutinize government activities and decision-making processes.
At its core, FOIA embodies the principle that an informed citizenry is essential to the functioning of a democratic society. By granting the public the right to request and obtain government records, FOIA serves as a check against corruption and enables citizens to hold their elected officials and government agencies accountable. This transparency mechanism has been instrumental in uncovering important information on a wide range of issues, from public safety concerns to national security matters, and has contributed significantly to public discourse and policy debates.
The impact of FOIA on government transparency is multifaceted and far-reaching. One of the primary ways FOIA promotes openness is through its proactive disclosure requirements. Under FOIA, federal agencies are obligated to automatically publish certain categories of information in the Federal Register and on their websites, without waiting for specific requests. This includes descriptions of agency organizations, functions, and procedures; substantive agency rules; and statements of general agency policy. Additionally, agencies must make available for public inspection final opinions and orders rendered in the adjudication of cases, specific policy statements, and certain administrative staff manuals. This proactive approach ensures that a significant amount of government information is readily accessible to the public, fostering a culture of openness and reducing the need for formal FOIA requests.
Beyond proactive disclosure, FOIA’s request-based system allows individuals to seek specific records that may not be publicly available. This aspect of the law is particularly powerful, as it enables citizens to delve into areas of government activity that might otherwise remain hidden from public view. The process of making a FOIA request is designed to be accessible to all, regardless of citizenship status or purpose. Any person can submit a request to a federal agency, describing the records they seek with reasonable specificity. Agencies are then required to conduct a thorough search for the requested records and provide a response within 20 business days, although extensions are possible in certain circumstances.
The broad scope of FOIA’s applicability is another key factor in its effectiveness as a transparency tool. The act covers records held by executive branch agencies, including departments, agencies, and offices of the federal government. This wide-ranging coverage ensures that virtually every aspect of federal government operations is subject to public scrutiny. From environmental protection policies to law enforcement activities, FOIA provides a mechanism for shedding light on diverse areas of government function.
However, it’s important to note that FOIA’s promotion of transparency is not absolute. The act includes nine exemptions that allow agencies to withhold certain types of information. These exemptions are designed to balance the public’s right to know with other important interests, such as national security, personal privacy, and law enforcement effectiveness. For example, Exemption 1 protects classified national defense and foreign policy information, while Exemption 6 shields personal privacy information. While these exemptions are necessary to protect legitimate government and private interests, they also represent potential limitations on transparency. The application of these exemptions is often a point of contention and legal challenge, as requesters and agencies may disagree on whether specific information should be released or withheld.
The role of FOIA in promoting government transparency extends beyond mere access to information. The act has fostered a culture of openness and accountability within federal agencies. Knowing that their actions and decisions may be subject to public scrutiny through FOIA requests, government officials are often more mindful of their responsibilities and the potential for public oversight. This awareness can lead to more careful decision-making processes and better record-keeping practices, ultimately contributing to more transparent and responsible governance.
FOIA has also played a crucial role in investigative journalism and public interest research. Journalists and researchers frequently use FOIA requests to uncover important stories and conduct in-depth investigations into government activities. This has led to numerous exposés of government misconduct, policy failures, and hidden information of public interest. For example, FOIA requests have been instrumental in revealing details about environmental hazards, government surveillance programs, and the treatment of detainees in military facilities. By providing access to primary source documents and data, FOIA enables journalists and researchers to present well-substantiated reports to the public, fostering informed debate on critical issues.
The impact of FOIA on government transparency is not limited to the federal level. Many states have enacted their own versions of freedom of information laws, often modeled after the federal FOIA. These state-level laws extend the principles of government transparency to state and local agencies, creating a comprehensive framework for public access to government information across all levels of governance in the United States. This cascading effect of FOIA principles has significantly expanded the scope of government transparency nationwide.
In recent years, technological advancements have enhanced FOIA’s effectiveness in promoting transparency. The advent of digital record-keeping and the internet has made it easier for agencies to store, search, and disseminate information. Many agencies now provide online FOIA request portals, allowing for more efficient submission and tracking of requests. Additionally, the E-FOIA amendments of 1996 required agencies to make certain types of records available electronically, further expanding public access to government information. These technological improvements have not only made the FOIA process more accessible but have also enabled agencies to handle a larger volume of requests more efficiently.
Despite its many successes, FOIA faces ongoing challenges in fully realizing its potential for promoting government transparency. One significant issue is the backlog of FOIA requests that many agencies face. The high volume of requests, combined with limited resources and complex review processes, often leads to delays in response times that can extend well beyond the statutory 20-day limit. These backlogs can significantly impede the timely release of information, potentially diminishing FOIA’s effectiveness as a tool for transparency and accountability.
Another challenge is the interpretation and application of FOIA exemptions. While exemptions are necessary to protect certain legitimate interests, there is ongoing debate about their scope and proper use. Critics argue that some agencies apply exemptions too broadly, using them to withhold information that should be public. This has led to numerous legal challenges and calls for reform to ensure that exemptions are not used to unnecessarily restrict access to information.
The issue of over-classification of government documents also poses a challenge to FOIA’s transparency goals. When information is classified, it becomes subject to FOIA’s national security exemption, potentially shielding it from public view for extended periods. Concerns have been raised about the overuse of classification, which can limit the amount of information available through FOIA requests and hinder public understanding of government activities, particularly in areas related to national security and foreign policy.
To address these challenges and enhance FOIA’s effectiveness, there have been several legislative updates and policy initiatives over the years. The OPEN Government Act of 2007 introduced several reforms, including the creation of the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) to mediate disputes between requesters and agencies, and the establishment of tracking numbers for FOIA requests. More recently, the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016 codified the “presumption of openness” principle, requiring agencies to release information unless there is a foreseeable harm or legal requirement to withhold it. This act also limited the use of Exemption 5 (deliberative process privilege) for records more than 25 years old and mandated the creation of a single FOIA request portal for all agencies.
The role of the judiciary in interpreting and enforcing FOIA has been crucial in shaping its impact on government transparency. Courts have played a significant role in defining the scope of FOIA exemptions, establishing standards for agency searches, and determining the adequacy of agency responses to FOIA requests. Judicial review provides an important check on agency discretion and helps ensure that FOIA’s transparency mandates are properly implemented. Notable court decisions have expanded public access to information in various areas, from environmental data to law enforcement records.
One area where FOIA has had a particularly significant impact on transparency is in the realm of protección del medio ambiente. Environmental groups and concerned citizens have frequently used FOIA to obtain information about pollution levels, enforcement actions, and policy decisions affecting public health and natural resources. This access to information has been crucial in holding polluters accountable and pushing for stronger environmental regulations. For example, FOIA requests have revealed details about water contamination issues, the environmental impacts of energy projects, and the influence of industry lobbying on environmental policy decisions.
FOIA has also been instrumental in shedding light on government surveillance programs and national security activities. While national security concerns often lead to information being withheld under FOIA exemptions, successful requests and subsequent litigation have revealed important details about controversial programs. This has included information about the NSA’s surveillance activities, the use of drones in military operations, and the treatment of detainees in facilities like Guantanamo Bay. These disclosures have sparked crucial public debates about privacy, civil liberties, and the balance between security and transparency.
In the realm of public health, FOIA has played a vital role in uncovering information about food safety, drug approvals, and healthcare policies. Journalists and advocacy groups have used FOIA requests to investigate issues such as the safety of medical devices, the approval process for pharmaceuticals, and government responses to public health crises. During the COVID-19 pandemic, FOIA requests have been crucial in obtaining data on infection rates, testing availability, and vaccine distribution, contributing to public understanding and oversight of the government’s pandemic response.
The impact of FOIA on financial transparency and accountability in government spending has been substantial. FOIA requests have been used to uncover details about government contracts, subsidies, and the use of taxpayer funds. This transparency has been crucial in identifying potential waste, fraud, and abuse in government spending. For instance, FOIA requests have revealed information about questionable government contracts, excessive spending on conferences and travel, and the misuse of funds in various federal programs.
FOIA’s role in promoting transparency extends to issues of civil rights and social justice. The act has been used to obtain records related to law enforcement practices, immigration policies, and discrimination cases. This information has been crucial in documenting patterns of misconduct, challenging discriminatory policies, and advocating for reforms. For example, FOIA requests have been instrumental in uncovering information about racial profiling in law enforcement, conditions in immigration detention centers, and the implementation of controversial policies like travel bans.
The international influence of FOIA is also worth noting. The United States’ FOIA has served as a model for similar laws in many other countries, contributing to a global movement towards greater government transparency. As of 2024, over 100 countries have enacted some form of freedom of information legislation, often drawing inspiration from the U.S. FOIA. This global spread of transparency laws has had a significant impact on international governance, facilitating greater accountability and citizen participation worldwide.
Despite its many successes, FOIA continues to evolve in response to changing technologies, government practices, and public expectations. One ongoing challenge is adapting FOIA to the digital age, where government communications and record-keeping increasingly occur through emails, instant messaging, and other electronic formats. Ensuring that these new forms of communication are properly preserved and accessible under FOIA is crucial for maintaining transparency in the modern era.
Another area of ongoing development is the relationship between FOIA and privacy concerns, particularly in light of advances in data collection and analysis. As government agencies collect and store more personal data, balancing the public’s right to know with individual privacy rights becomes increasingly complex. This tension has led to debates about how to apply FOIA’s privacy exemptions in the context of large datasets and digital records.
The role of FOIA in promoting transparency in government contracting and public-private partnerships is also an area of growing importance. As governments increasingly rely on private sector partners to deliver public services, ensuring transparency in these arrangements becomes crucial. FOIA requests have been used to scrutinize government contracts, revealing important information about costs, performance metrics, and potential conflicts of interest.
Looking to the future, there are ongoing discussions about potential reforms to further strengthen FOIA’s effectiveness in promoting government transparency. Proposals include streamlining the request process, increasing funding for FOIA offices to address backlogs, enhancing penalties for non-compliance, and expanding the scope of proactive disclosures. There are also calls for better integration of FOIA principles into government record-keeping practices from the outset, to facilitate easier and more comprehensive responses to information requests.
In conclusion, the Freedom of Information Act has been a powerful force for promoting transparency in government since its inception. By providing a legal mechanism for public access to government records, FOIA has enabled citizens, journalists, and organizations to scrutinize government activities, uncover important information, and hold officials accountable. While challenges remain in its implementation and there is ongoing debate about its scope and application, FOIA continues to play a crucial role in fostering an open and accountable democracy. As government practices and technologies evolve, the principles embodied in FOIA remain essential for ensuring that the public’s right to know is protected and that transparency remains a cornerstone of democratic governance in the United States.
Fuentes:
Citations:
[1] https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46238
[2] https://epic.org/issues/open-government/foia/
[3] https://theconversation.com/growing-secrecy-limits-government-accountability-221553
[4] https://www.dea.gov/foia/about-foia
[5] https://www.justice.gov/archive/oip/foia_guide09/introduction.pdf
[6] https://www.gao.gov/blog/foia-backlogs-hinder-government-transparency-and-accountability
Suscríbase a nuestro boletín para actualizaciones
Acerca de Attorneys.Media
Attorneys.Media es una innovadora plataforma de medios de comunicación diseñada para salvar la distancia entre los profesionales del Derecho y el público. Aprovecha el poder de los contenidos de vídeo para desmitificar temas jurídicos complejos, facilitando a los particulares la comprensión de diversos aspectos del Derecho. Mediante entrevistas con abogados especializados en distintos campos, la plataforma ofrece valiosas perspectivas sobre cuestiones jurídicas tanto civiles como penales.
El modelo de negocio de Attorneys.Media no sólo mejora el conocimiento público de los asuntos jurídicos, sino que también ofrece a los abogados una oportunidad única de mostrar su experiencia y conectar con clientes potenciales. Las entrevistas en vídeo cubren un amplio espectro de temas jurídicos, ofreciendo a los espectadores una comprensión más profunda de los procesos legales, derechos y consideraciones dentro de diferentes contextos.
Para quienes buscan información jurídica, Attorneys.Media constituye un recurso dinámico y accesible. El énfasis en los contenidos de vídeo responde a la creciente preferencia por el aprendizaje visual y auditivo, haciendo que la información jurídica compleja sea más digerible para el público en general.
Al mismo tiempo, para los profesionales del Derecho, la plataforma ofrece una valiosa vía de visibilidad y compromiso con un público más amplio, ampliando potencialmente su base de clientes.
De forma única, Attorneys.Media representa un enfoque moderno para facilitar la educación y el conocimiento de cuestiones jurídicas dentro del sector público y la posterior consulta legal con abogados locales.