design defect

How to Prove Liability in a Crash Involving Tesla Autopilot or Full Self-Driving (FSD) in California

How to Prove Liability in a Crash Involving Tesla Autopilot or Full Self-Driving (FSD) in California

Proving liability in a Tesla Autopilot or Full Self-Driving (FSD) crash in California typically requires evidence of (1) who had control, (2) what the system did, and (3) whether a defect, misrepresentation, or negligent driving caused the collision. Because these cases blend driver negligence, product liability, and digital evidence, early preservation is critical. This article […]

How to Prove Liability in a Crash Involving Tesla Autopilot or Full Self-Driving (FSD) in California Read More »

How to Prove a Defective Blind-Spot Monitoring System Caused Your Lane-Change Crash in California

How to Prove a Defective Blind-Spot Monitoring System Caused Your Lane-Change Crash in California

[In California, proving a defective blind-spot monitoring (BSM) system caused your lane-change crash usually requires an event data recorder (EDR) download plus expert analysis linking the warning failure to the collision. These cases hinge on preserving the vehicle and digital evidence before repairs or salvage erase key data. This article explains the legal theories, evidence

How to Prove a Defective Blind-Spot Monitoring System Caused Your Lane-Change Crash in California Read More »

Manufacturer Liability in Product Claims

Product Liability Claims: When Manufacturers Are Responsible

Manufacturers can be liable under 3 main theories: strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty. Liability often turns on whether a product had a design, manufacturing, or warning defect that caused foreseeable harm. This article explains when manufacturers are responsible, key proof elements, defenses, and recent legal trends. Product liability claims arise when manufacturers are

Product Liability Claims: When Manufacturers Are Responsible Read More »

Scroll to Top