By 2026, an AI vendor addendum should hardwire EU AI Act obligations plus allocate hallucination risk through warranties, testing, audit rights, and indemnities. The EU AI Act’s risk-based duties will affect both EU deployments and many non-EU vendors supplying EU customers. This article provides a clause-by-clause drafting roadmap attorneys can use to reduce regulatory and […]
The EU AI Act’s first compliance obligations begin applying in 2026 for many “high-risk” AI systems, with fines that can reach up to 7% of worldwide annual turnover. U.S. SaaS vendors selling into the EU (or whose customers deploy in the EU) can be pulled into the Act’s extraterritorial scope—driving immediate demand for practical, contract-ready
U.S. companies selling into the EU must align AI vendor contracts with the EU AI Act’s risk-based duties—especially for high-risk systems with mandatory compliance controls. The Act reaches many U.S. providers and deployers through its extraterritorial scope when AI outputs are used in the EU. This article explains how to draft enforceable AI vendor agreements
Germany-based law firms deploying client-facing chatbots must align with the EU AI Act’s risk controls, transparency rules, and (where applicable) high-risk obligations before full enforcement in 2026. Because these tools often handle sensitive client data and can influence legal decisions, German practices must coordinate AI Act compliance with GDPR and professional secrecy (BRAO). This article
German law firms using generative AI for document review must comply with the EU AI Act’s obligations for deployers and, in some cases, providers—especially when the tool qualifies as “high-risk” or uses a GPAI model. In Germany, this sits alongside strict GDPR, professional secrecy (Verschwiegenheit), and client confidentiality expectations. This article explains how to classify
Germany-based employers deploying a high-risk hiring AI in 2026 must meet the EU AI Act’s Title III requirements plus German labor, works council, and data protection obligations. Because hiring systems typically qualify as “high-risk,” compliance is not optional and enforcement risk is real. This article provides a practical 2026 checklist for lawful deployment in Germany,
The EU AI Act can apply to a U.S.-developed customer-support chatbot the moment it is deployed for users in Germany, and non-compliance can trigger administrative fines up to €35 million or 7% of global annual turnover. Germany-based deployment also layers on GDPR, consumer law, and works council obligations. This article explains how to classify the
The EU AI Act’s key compliance deadlines have been pushed back, giving U.S. companies extra time—but not a free pass—to prepare. Despite the delay, expected obligations around high‑risk systems, governance, documentation, and transparency are still coming, and enforcement risk will grow as timelines firm up. This article explains what changed, what likely remains, and the
The EU AI Act Just Delayed — What American Companies Should Do Instead Read More »
