The cryptocurrency fraud case involving Sam Bankman-Fried culminated in a 25-year prison sentence, marking one of the most significant white-collar criminal prosecutions in recent history. Bankman-Fried, the founder of the now-defunct cryptocurrency exchange FTX, was convicted on seven counts of fraud and conspiracy following a month-long trial in the Southern District of New York. The sentence, handed down on March 28, 2024, represents a dramatic fall from grace for the former billionaire who was once celebrated as a pioneer in the digital asset industry. This case has far-reaching implications for securities fraud enforcement, cryptocurrency regulation, and the prosecution of financial crimes in the digital age.
The conviction of Bankman-Fried serves as a stark reminder that traditional fraud laws apply with equal force to emerging technologies and markets. Despite the novel context of cryptocurrency exchanges, prosecutors successfully demonstrated that Bankman-Fried’s actions constituted straightforward fraud—misappropriating customer funds, misleading investors, and engaging in deceptive business practices. The case highlights the justice system’s ability to adapt existing legal frameworks to address new forms of financial misconduct, even as technology evolves at a rapid pace.
The Rise and Fall of FTX
Before its spectacular collapse in November 2022, FTX had established itself as one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges with a global reach spanning more than 130 international affiliates. Bankman-Fried, often referred to by his initials SBF, had cultivated an image as a wunderkind of the crypto industry—a brilliant MIT graduate who applied mathematical principles to trading and pledged to donate much of his fortune to charitable causes. This carefully crafted persona helped attract billions in investments from venture capital firms and individual investors alike.
The exchange’s downfall began when concerns about FTX’s financial stability triggered a run on the platform, with customers rushing to withdraw their funds. Within days, it became apparent that FTX did not have sufficient reserves to honor these withdrawal requests. The company filed for bankruptcy protection on November 11, 2022, and Bankman-Fried resigned as CEO. Subsequent investigations revealed that customer deposits had been improperly transferred to Alameda Research, a crypto hedge fund also owned by Bankman-Fried, which had used the funds for risky investments, political donations, luxury real estate purchases, and personal loans to executives.
The collapse of FTX sent shockwaves through the cryptocurrency industry, wiping out billions in market value and undermining public confidence in digital asset platforms. Many customers who had entrusted their savings to FTX found themselves unable to access their funds, with bankruptcy proceedings still ongoing. The scale of the fraud—estimated at over $8 billion in misappropriated customer funds—placed it among the largest financial frauds in American history, drawing comparisons to infamous schemes perpetrated by Bernie Madoff and Enron executives.
Criminal Charges and Trial
Federal prosecutors charged Bankman-Fried with an array of financial crimes that painted a picture of systematic fraud and deception. The seven-count indictment included charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud on customers, wire fraud on customers, conspiracy to commit wire fraud on lenders, wire fraud on lenders, conspiracy to commit commodities fraud, conspiracy to commit securities fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering. These charges collectively carried a maximum potential sentence of 110 years in prison.
The prosecution’s case relied heavily on testimony from former FTX and Alameda Research executives who had pleaded guilty and agreed to cooperate with authorities. These witnesses, including former Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison, provided damning firsthand accounts of Bankman-Fried’s direction and knowledge of the fraudulent activities. They testified that Bankman-Fried had instructed them to divert customer funds from FTX to Alameda Research and to create secret backdoor systems that allowed Alameda to maintain a negative balance on FTX without triggering the automatic liquidation mechanisms that would have applied to other customers.
Throughout the trial, Bankman-Fried’s defense team attempted to portray him as a well-intentioned entrepreneur who had made mistakes but lacked criminal intent. They argued that the complex nature of cryptocurrency businesses and the rapid growth of FTX had led to organizational failures rather than deliberate fraud. However, this defense strategy proved ineffective against the mountain of evidence presented by prosecutors, including internal communications, financial records, and testimony from former associates. After deliberating for just five hours, the jury returned guilty verdicts on all seven counts on November 2, 2023.
Sentencing Considerations
The sentencing phase of Bankman-Fried’s case attracted significant attention from legal observers, as it presented an opportunity to assess how the justice system would punish a high-profile white collar crime in the cryptocurrency space. Federal sentencing guidelines, which provide a framework for judges to determine appropriate punishments based on the severity of the offense and the defendant’s criminal history, suggested a sentence of 105 to 130 years for Bankman-Fried’s crimes. However, these guidelines are advisory rather than mandatory, giving judges considerable discretion in determining the final sentence.
In their sentencing memorandum, prosecutors requested a prison term of 40 to 50 years, arguing that the magnitude of the fraud, the abuse of customer trust, and Bankman-Fried’s lack of remorse warranted severe punishment. They emphasized that the sentence needed to reflect the seriousness of the offense and provide deterrence to others who might contemplate similar schemes. Bankman-Fried’s defense team, meanwhile, advocated for a much lighter sentence of 6.5 years, contending that he had no prior criminal history and that many victims would ultimately recover a substantial portion of their losses through the bankruptcy process.
Judge Lewis Kaplan, who presided over the case, ultimately sentenced Bankman-Fried to 25 years in federal prison—a term that fell between the extremes advocated by the prosecution and defense but still represented one of the harshest sentences ever imposed for a white-collar crime. In explaining his decision, Judge Kaplan cited the need to protect the public, noting that there was “a risk that this man will be in a position to do something very bad in the future, and it’s not a trivial risk.” He also pointed to Bankman-Fried’s political ambitions as a motivating factor behind the fraud, suggesting that he “wanted to be a hugely, hugely politically influential person in this country.”
Comparison to Other White-Collar Sentences
Bankman-Fried’s 25-year sentence places him among the most severely punished white-collar criminals in American history, though it falls well short of the 150-year sentence imposed on Bernie Madoff for his $20 billion Ponzi scheme. The sentence exceeds those given to many other high-profile financial fraud cases, including the 11-year term received by Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes for defrauding investors in her failed blood-testing startup.
The relative severity of Bankman-Fried’s sentence reflects several factors unique to his case. First, the scale of the fraud—involving billions of dollars and affecting thousands of victims worldwide—placed it among the largest financial crimes ever prosecuted. Second, the brazen nature of the scheme, which involved the direct misappropriation of customer deposits that were supposed to be securely held, represented a fundamental violation of trust. Third, Bankman-Fried’s behavior following FTX’s collapse, including attempts to contact potential witnesses and public statements that appeared to contradict evidence, may have influenced the judge’s perception of his character and remorse.
The sentence also reflects broader trends in the prosecution of white-collar crime, with federal authorities increasingly seeking substantial prison terms for major financial frauds. This approach represents a shift from earlier eras when white-collar offenders often received relatively light sentences compared to those imposed for other types of crime. The Department of Justice has emphasized the importance of meaningful penalties for corporate wrongdoing as a means of deterring future misconduct and maintaining public confidence in the financial system.
Federal Prison Realities
Bankman-Fried will serve his sentence in the federal prison system, which operates differently from state correctional facilities. Federal inmates typically serve approximately 85% of their sentenced term, as there is no parole in the federal system. However, inmates can earn up to 54 days of “good time” credit per year for good behavior, potentially reducing Bankman-Fried’s actual time served by several years. Additionally, under the First Step Act of 2018, nonviolent offenders may qualify for further sentence reductions through participation in recidivism reduction programs, though the extent to which Bankman-Fried might benefit from these provisions remains uncertain.
Judge Kaplan recommended that Bankman-Fried be placed in a medium-security facility or lower-security institution as close as possible to the San Francisco area to facilitate family visits. The Bureau of Prisons, which makes the final determination on inmate placement, typically considers factors such as the nature of the offense, the length of the sentence, the inmate’s security needs, and institutional population levels when assigning prisoners. Given the high-profile nature of Bankman-Fried’s case and potential safety concerns, his placement may require special consideration.
Life in federal prison will represent a dramatic change for Bankman-Fried, who was accustomed to luxury apartments, private jets, and the trappings of billionaire status. Federal inmates face strict limitations on personal possessions, communications with the outside world, and daily activities. They typically share dormitory-style housing or small cells, eat institutional meals, and work prison jobs that pay minimal wages. While federal facilities generally provide basic educational and recreational programs, the environment is designed for security and control rather than comfort.
Financial Penalties and Restitution
In addition to the prison sentence, Judge Kaplan ordered Bankman-Fried to forfeit $11.2 billion, representing the proceeds of his criminal activity. This forfeiture order is largely symbolic, as Bankman-Fried’s personal fortune has largely evaporated with the collapse of FTX and his other ventures. However, it establishes a legal claim against any assets he may acquire in the future, ensuring that any financial success he achieves after serving his sentence will be subject to collection for the benefit of victims.
The court did not order a separate restitution amount, noting that it would be impractical given the large number of victims and the ongoing bankruptcy proceedings. The FTX bankruptcy estate is working to recover and liquidate assets for distribution to creditors, including former customers of the exchange. Recent reports indicate that many creditors may ultimately recover a substantial portion of their losses, though the process is expected to take years to complete and the final recovery rates remain uncertain.
The financial consequences of Bankman-Fried’s crimes extend beyond the formal penalties imposed by the court. He faces numerous civil lawsuits from investors, customers, and other parties harmed by FTX’s collapse. These legal actions seek billions in damages and may result in additional judgments against him. Moreover, the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission have brought civil enforcement actions that could result in additional penalties and permanent bars from participating in certain industries.
Legal Appeals and Future Proceedings
Following the sentencing, Bankman-Fried’s legal team announced their intention to appeal both his conviction and sentence. The appeal process in federal criminal cases typically begins with a notice of appeal filed within 14 days of the judgment, followed by briefing and oral arguments before a three-judge panel of the relevant circuit court of appeals. The appeal will likely focus on alleged errors in the trial proceedings, such as evidentiary rulings, jury instructions, or the application of sentencing guidelines.
Successful appeals in high-profile criminal fraud cases are relatively rare, particularly when the evidence of guilt is substantial. Appellate courts generally defer to trial judges on matters of fact and credibility determinations, limiting their review to questions of law and procedure. However, complex financial crime cases sometimes present novel legal issues that may provide grounds for appeal, such as the application of traditional fraud statutes to cryptocurrency activities or questions about the proper calculation of loss amounts for sentencing purposes.
In addition to the criminal case, Bankman-Fried faces ongoing legal challenges in the bankruptcy proceedings and civil litigation. The bankruptcy trustee continues to investigate FTX’s collapse and may pursue additional claims against Bankman-Fried and other former executives. Civil lawsuits from investors and customers are proceeding in various jurisdictions, though some may be stayed pending the resolution of the criminal case. These parallel proceedings ensure that legal consequences from the FTX collapse will continue to unfold for years to come.
Implications for Cryptocurrency Regulation
The FTX collapse and Bankman-Fried’s conviction have accelerated calls for enhanced regulation of the cryptocurrency industry. Prior to these events, cryptocurrency exchanges operated in a regulatory gray area, with limited oversight compared to traditional financial institutions. The spectacular failure of FTX—which had presented itself as a legitimate, compliant business—highlighted the risks posed by this regulatory gap and the potential for consumer harm.
In the United States, multiple federal agencies have intensified their scrutiny of cryptocurrency businesses in the wake of the FTX collapse. The Securities and Exchange Commission has taken an increasingly aggressive stance on digital assets, arguing that many cryptocurrencies qualify as securities subject to its jurisdiction. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has similarly expanded its enforcement efforts in the crypto space, while the Department of Justice has established specialized units focused on cryptocurrency-related crimes. Congress has also shown renewed interest in establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets, though legislative progress has been slow.
Internationally, the FTX case has prompted similar regulatory responses. Many countries have accelerated efforts to develop or strengthen cryptocurrency regulations, with a particular focus on consumer protection, anti-money laundering measures, and financial stability. The global nature of FTX’s operations—spanning numerous jurisdictions through a complex web of affiliated entities—has also highlighted the challenges of effective cross-border regulation and the need for international coordination in overseeing digital asset markets.
Impact on the Cryptocurrency Market
Beyond the regulatory implications, Bankman-Fried’s conviction and the FTX collapse have had profound effects on the broader cryptocurrency market. The immediate aftermath of FTX’s bankruptcy filing in November 2022 saw significant price declines across major cryptocurrencies, as investors questioned the stability of the entire ecosystem. While markets have subsequently recovered to some extent, the episode has left lasting scars on the industry’s reputation and undermined public confidence in cryptocurrency exchanges.
The FTX debacle has forced other cryptocurrency businesses to demonstrate their financial soundness and operational integrity. Many exchanges have implemented “proof of reserves” systems that allow customers to verify that their deposits are fully backed by assets under the exchange’s control. Some have engaged independent auditors to review their financial statements and custody arrangements. These transparency measures represent a significant shift for an industry that had previously operated with minimal disclosure requirements.
The case has also prompted a reevaluation of the centralized exchange model that dominated the early cryptocurrency industry. Centralized exchanges like FTX function as custodians of customer assets, creating potential for misuse if proper controls are not maintained. In response to the FTX collapse, there has been increased interest in decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols and non-custodial trading platforms that allow users to retain control of their assets. While these alternatives present their own risks and limitations, they potentially reduce the type of custodial risk that materialized in the FTX case.
Lessons for Investors and Consumers
The Bankman-Fried case offers important lessons for investors and consumers in the cryptocurrency space and beyond. Perhaps the most fundamental takeaway is the enduring relevance of traditional due diligence principles, even in novel technological contexts. Many FTX customers and investors were attracted by Bankman-Fried’s carefully cultivated image as a mathematical genius and effective altruist, without scrutinizing the exchange’s actual business practices, governance structures, or financial controls.
The case highlights the risks of concentration and counterparty exposure in financial services. FTX customers who kept substantial portions of their cryptocurrency holdings on the exchange found themselves unable to access their assets when problems emerged. This experience reinforces the importance of diversification—not just across different assets, but also across different custodians and storage methods. The cryptocurrency community has long emphasized the principle of self-custody through the mantra “not your keys, not your coins,” which the FTX collapse painfully validated.
For investors evaluating cryptocurrency businesses or other financial technology ventures, the case underscores the importance of robust corporate governance and internal controls. FTX operated with remarkably informal management structures and inadequate financial systems for a company of its size and importance. The absence of an independent board of directors, qualified financial officers, and proper accounting systems created an environment where misconduct could flourish undetected. These red flags might have been identified through proper due diligence before the collapse.
Corporate Governance Failures
The FTX debacle represents one of the most spectacular corporate governance failures in recent business history. Post-bankruptcy investigations revealed that the company operated with virtually none of the checks and balances expected of a multi-billion-dollar financial institution. There was no independent board of directors providing oversight, no chief financial officer maintaining proper accounts, and no clear separation between the operations of FTX and Alameda Research despite their obvious conflicts of interest.
The company’s record-keeping was described by bankruptcy administrators as unprofessional and unreliable, with critical financial decisions documented through messaging apps rather than formal accounting systems. Expenses were approved through an informal system in which employees could authorize transactions with personalized emoji reactions. Corporate funds were used to purchase hundreds of millions of dollars in personal real estate for executives without proper documentation or clear business purpose.
These governance failures enabled the misappropriation of customer funds and other misconduct that ultimately led to the company’s collapse. They also highlight the dangers of founder-dominated corporate structures where charismatic leaders operate with minimal accountability. Bankman-Fried exercised near-total control over the FTX empire, with few internal or external constraints on his authority. This concentration of power, combined with the company’s rapid growth and the complex nature of its business, created ideal conditions for fraud to develop and persist undetected.
Media Coverage and Public Perception
The Bankman-Fried case attracted extraordinary media attention from its inception through the sentencing phase. Prior to FTX’s collapse, Bankman-Fried had cultivated relationships with journalists and appeared regularly in major financial publications, which often portrayed him as a brilliant innovator and the respectable face of the cryptocurrency industry. This positive coverage helped legitimize FTX and attract customers and investors who might otherwise have been skeptical of cryptocurrency ventures.
When FTX imploded, media coverage shifted dramatically, with intense scrutiny of Bankman-Fried’s business practices, lifestyle, and personal history. Journalists uncovered details about the company’s operations in the Bahamas, the web of related entities that comprised the FTX empire, and the close relationships among the company’s senior executives. The case became a cautionary tale about the dangers of uncritical media coverage and the risks of elevating business leaders to celebrity status without adequate scrutiny of their claims and accomplishments.
Public perception of Bankman-Fried evolved similarly, from admiration to contempt as the details of the fraud emerged. His carefully constructed image as a disheveled genius who lived modestly and planned to give away his fortune was revealed as largely fictional. Instead, investigations showed that he had used company funds to purchase luxury real estate, make political donations, and sustain a lavish lifestyle while presenting himself as indifferent to material wealth. This disconnect between image and reality has made Bankman-Fried a symbol of deception and hypocrisy in business.
Political Dimensions and Campaign Contributions
One distinctive aspect of the Bankman-Fried case was its political dimension. Prior to FTX’s collapse, Bankman-Fried had emerged as a major political donor, contributing approximately $40 million to candidates and committees, primarily supporting Democrats, during the 2022 election cycle. He had publicly discussed plans to spend up to $1 billion on future political campaigns, positioning himself as a significant force in American politics.
These political activities took on new significance when it emerged that FTX customer funds had been misappropriated. Questions arose about whether political donations had been made with misappropriated funds and whether Bankman-Fried’s political connections had helped shield FTX from regulatory scrutiny. While no evidence has emerged that politicians were aware of FTX’s fraudulent activities, many recipients of Bankman-Fried’s donations returned the funds or donated equivalent amounts to charity after the scandal broke.
During sentencing, Judge Kaplan specifically cited Bankman-Fried’s political ambitions as a motivating factor behind the fraud, suggesting that he sought wealth and influence to advance his policy agenda. This assessment aligns with Bankman-Fried’s own statements about his interest in shaping cryptocurrency regulation and other policy areas. The case thus illustrates how financial crimes can be motivated not just by personal greed but also by the pursuit of power and influence in the political sphere.
International Dimensions of the Case
The FTX case had significant international dimensions that complicated both the fraud itself and the subsequent legal proceedings. Although FTX was founded by American citizens and served many American customers, its parent company was headquartered in the Bahamas, where Bankman-Fried and other executives lived in a luxury resort compound. This offshore structure allowed FTX to operate with less regulatory oversight than would have been possible in the United States.
Following FTX’s collapse, Bankman-Fried remained in the Bahamas while legal proceedings began in the United States. He was arrested by Bahamian authorities in December 2022 at the request of the U.S. government and initially contested extradition before ultimately agreeing to return to the United States to face charges. The international aspects of the case required coordination between U.S. and Bahamian authorities and raised complex questions about jurisdiction and the application of U.S. laws to offshore activities.
The global nature of FTX’s operations also created challenges for the bankruptcy process and efforts to recover assets for creditors. The company operated through a complex network of entities in various jurisdictions, with assets scattered across the world. Bankruptcy administrators have had to navigate different legal systems and work with authorities in multiple countries to identify and secure assets belonging to the FTX estate.
Looking at the search results, I can see that the article is about Sam Bankman-Fried’s conviction and 25-year prison sentence. The article appears to be incomplete and needs to be finished. Based on the available information, I’ll complete the article focusing on the most recent developments.
Sam Bankman-Fried’s conviction and 25-year prison sentence
The cryptocurrency fraud case involving Sam Bankman-Fried culminated in a 25-year prison sentence, marking one of the most significant white-collar criminal prosecutions in recent history. Bankman-Fried, the founder of the now-defunct cryptocurrency exchange FTX, was convicted on seven counts of fraud and conspiracy following a month-long trial in the Southern District of New York. The sentence, handed down on March 28, 2024, represents a dramatic fall from grace for the former billionaire who was once celebrated as a pioneer in the digital asset industry. This case has far-reaching implications for securities fraud enforcement, cryptocurrency regulation, and the prosecution of financial crimes in the digital age.
The conviction of Bankman-Fried serves as a stark reminder that traditional fraud laws apply with equal force to emerging technologies and markets. Despite the novel context of cryptocurrency exchanges, prosecutors successfully demonstrated that Bankman-Fried’s actions constituted straightforward fraud—misappropriating customer funds, misleading investors, and engaging in deceptive business practices. The case highlights the justice system’s ability to adapt existing legal frameworks to address new forms of financial misconduct, even as technology evolves at a rapid pace.
Recent Developments: Prison Life and Media Appearances
Currently, Bankman-Fried remains detained on the fourth floor of the Brooklyn Metropolitan Detention Center in a section reserved for high-profile inmates. Despite his incarceration, he has managed to maintain a public presence through unauthorized media appearances. In March 2025, Bankman-Fried conducted an interview with Tucker Carlson that was not approved by prison authorities, resulting in disciplinary action. According to prison consultants familiar with federal detention protocols, Bankman-Fried likely circumvented regulations by passing off the interview as a legal video call.
The unauthorized interview appears to be part of a calculated strategy. In a memo released by federal prosecutors during his trial, Bankman-Fried had outlined a 19-point plan to rehabilitate his image, which included “Go on Tucker Carlson, come out as a republican” and “Come out against the woke agenda.” This recent media appearance aligns with that strategy and has reportedly resulted in Bankman-Fried spending time in solitary confinement as punishment.
Pardon Campaign
Behind the scenes, Bankman-Fried and his supporters have launched an ambitious campaign seeking a presidential pardon from President Trump. His parents, both Stanford law professors and lifelong Democrats, are reportedly consulting with Kory Langhofer, an attorney who participated in Trump’s presidential campaigns in 2016 and 2020. This effort represents a dramatic political pivot for Bankman-Fried, who was previously known as a major Democratic donor having contributed approximately $40 million to candidates and committees during the 2022 election cycle.
The pardon strategy appears to be multifaceted. In his recent interview with Tucker Carlson, Bankman-Fried claimed that by late 2022 he was secretly donating as much to Republicans as Democrats. He has also insisted that he is not a criminal, despite the jury’s unanimous verdict finding him guilty on all seven counts after just five hours of deliberation. Political observers note that this approach aligns with President Trump’s history of granting clemency based on personal connections and political calculations.
Actual Time to Be Served
While Bankman-Fried received a 25-year sentence, legal experts suggest he is unlikely to serve the full term. Federal prisoners can earn up to 54 days of time credit per year for good behavior, potentially reducing his sentence by approximately 15%. Additionally, under the First Step Act of 2018, nonviolent federal inmates can reduce their sentence by as much as 50% through participation in recidivism reduction programs.
Christopher Zoukis, a federal prison consultant, estimates Bankman-Fried will likely serve about three-quarters of his sentence. This calculation includes credit for the approximately 7.5 months he spent in prison before sentencing, the automatic 15% reduction for good conduct (about 45 months), and potential additional reductions through the First Step Act.
Judge Lewis Kaplan recommended that Bankman-Fried be placed in a medium-security facility or lower-security institution as close as possible to the San Francisco area to facilitate family visits. However, as of May 2024, reports indicated that while a transfer process to FCI Mendota had begun, Bankman-Fried requested to remain in MDC Brooklyn while pursuing his appeal.
Financial Penalties and Restitution
In addition to imprisonment, Judge Kaplan ordered Bankman-Fried to forfeit $11.02 billion. This forfeiture order will follow him for life, with legal experts noting that it would take the vast majority of what he earns after release from prison. The judge did not order separate restitution, determining it would be “impractical” given the large number of victims and the ongoing bankruptcy proceedings.
The FTX bankruptcy estate continues to work on recovering and liquidating assets for distribution to creditors, including former customers of the exchange. While some reports suggest creditors may recover a substantial portion of their losses, the process is expected to take years to complete.
Bankman-Fried’s legal team has filed an appeal of both his conviction and sentence. His parents issued a statement following the sentencing, saying: “We are heartbroken and will continue to fight for our son.” However, successful appeals in high-profile fraud cases with substantial evidence are relatively rare.
As Bankman-Fried serves his sentence and pursues both legal appeals and political clemency, his case continues to shape discussions about accountability in the cryptocurrency industry, the prosecution of financial crimes, and the boundaries of executive clemency in the American justice system.
Citations:
- https://www.yahoo.com/news/sam-bankman-fried-reportedly-thrown-155310463.html
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Sam_Bankman-Fried
- https://www.bbc.com/news/business-68677487
- https://www.acfe.com/acfe-insights-blog/blog-detail?s=sam-bankman-fried-sentencing-in-context
- https://govcentre.org/sam-bankman-frieds-money-laundering-charges-and-crypto-regulation/
- https://johndrogerslaw.com/the-sam-bankman-fried-trial-cryptos-most-high-profile-case/
- https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/white-collar_crime
- https://thelawofficesofgrantbettencourt.com/consequences-of-white-collar-crime-charge/
- https://elizabethfranklinbest.com/scotus-takes-a-close-look-at-white-collar-crime-in-two-recent-cases-percoco-and-ciminelli/
- https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/28/business/ftx-sam-bankman-fried-sentencing/index.html
- https://gunnercooke.com/what-did-the-sam-bankman-fried-case-teach-us-about-the-need-for-a-legal-framework/
- https://www.justia.com/criminal/offenses/white-collar-crimes/
- https://www.dwg-law.com/exploring-white-collar-crimes-what-are-the-legal-consequences-for-fraud/
- https://rserafinilaw.com/federal-sentencing-guidelines-for-white-collar-cases/
- https://apnews.com/article/sam-bankman-fried-ftx-cryptocurrency-sentencing-sbf-d7bb1a5e94b4c22039d74dfeab1a2ff1
- https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/sam-bankman-fried-sentenced-25-years-prison-orchestrating-ftx-fraud-rcna145286
- https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/samuel-bankman-fried-sentenced-25-years-prison
- https://www.reuters.com/legal/bankman-fried-appeals-ftx-fraud-conviction-25-year-sentence-2024-04-11/
- https://www.npr.org/2024/03/28/1241210300/sam-bankman-fried-ftx-sentencing-crimes-crypto-mogul-greed
- https://fortune.com/crypto/2025/03/12/sam-bankman-fried-ftx-prison-tucker-carlson-bop-sanctions/
- https://www.yahoo.com/news/sam-bankman-fried-behind-bars-152400575.html
- https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/28/technology/sam-bankman-fried-sentenced.html
- https://www.reuters.com/technology/sam-bankman-fried-be-sentenced-multi-billion-dollar-ftx-fraud-2024-03-28/
- https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/samuel-bankman-fried-sentenced-25-years-his-orchestration-multiple-fraudulent-schemes
- https://natlawreview.com/article/crypto-comeuppance-deep-dive-sentencing-ftx-founder-sam-bankman-fried
- https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/28/sam-bankman-fried-ftx-fraud-victim-says-life-was-destroyed.html
- https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/column-ftx-customers-shouldered-extraordinary-costs-bankman-fried-conviction-law-2024-09-24/
- https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/07/technology/sam-bankman-fried-pardon-trump.html
- https://www.whitefordlaw.com/news-events/client-alert-ftx-fraud-case-highlights-risks-and-rewards-of-cooperation-in-crypto-cases
- https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/27/technology/sam-bankman-fried-fraud-ftx.html
- https://law.rutgers.edu/news/significance-and-consequences-ftx-crypto-collapse
- https://www.americanbanker.com/list/looking-back-the-fall-of-crypto-giant-sam-bankman-fried
- https://sevenpillarsinstitute-org.sevenpillarsconsulting.com/case-study-ftx-and-sam-bankman-fried/
- https://www.pulj.org/the-roundtable/an-analysis-of-the-legal-implications-of-the-ftx-cryptocurrency-collapse
- https://mitsloan.mit.edu/teaching-resources-library/sam-bankman-frieds-ftx
- https://ethisphere.com/the-sbf-verdict-and-how-crypto-can-benefit-from-better-regulation/
- https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/02/technology/sam-bankman-fried-fraud-trial-ftx.html
- https://www.npr.org/2023/11/11/1211886643/sbf-ftx-crypto-bitcoin-regulation-cryptocurrency-finance-bankman-fried
- https://gallianfirm.com/potential-legal-defenses-in-the-ftx-cryptocurrency-case/
- https://news.gsu.edu/2023/10/20/bankman-fried/
- https://www.law.uw.edu/news-events/news/2024/all-about-white-collar-crime
- https://beggslane.com/recent-changes-in-white-collar-crime-laws-and-their-implications/
- https://robertjdegrootlaw.com/notable-white-collar-crime-cases-of-2023/
- https://www.powertriallawyers.com/blog/the-complexities-of-white-collar-crime-a-legal-perspective-from-power-trial-lawyers/
- https://www.nu.edu/blog/common-white-collar-crimes/
- https://adamsdefenselaw.com/most-famous-white-collar-crime-cases/
- https://www.acfe.com/acfe-insights-blog/blog-detail?s=prosecution-and-penalties-of-white-collar-crimes
- https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/white-collar-crime
- https://www.westacademic.com/OSullivans-Federal-White-Collar-Crime-Cases-and-Materials-9th-9798887867977
- https://www.buttersbrazilian.com/effective-strategies-for-defending-against-white-collar-crime-charges/
- https://caselaw.findlaw.com/summary/search/?query=filters&dateFormat=yyyyMMdd&topic=cs_77&pgnum=4
- https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-charges/white-collar-crime.html
- https://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1bpz163/sam_bankmanfried_sentenced_to_25_years_in_prison/
- https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sam-bankman-fried-ftx-founder-appeals-fraud-conviction/
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iv91OtY6yyI
- https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/feature/FTX-scam-explained-Everything-you-need-to-know
- https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/28/business/sam-bankman-fried-sentence-ftx/index.html
- https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022-219
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFGC_A7Z9iQ
- https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8938-24
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Bankman-Fried
- https://www.rahmanravelli.co.uk/expertise/cryptocurrency/articles/the-impact-of-sam-bankman-fried-s-conviction/
- https://www.investopedia.com/what-went-wrong-with-ftx-6828447
- https://www.christagrosheklaw.com/articles/rajaratnam-case-sets-new-precedent-for-white-collar-crime-in-minnesota/
- https://www.criminaljustice.com/10-white-collar-crime-cases-that-made-headlines/
English 
Español de México