Court Decision

Explore a comprehensive collection of court decision analyses and summaries, providing insights into significant rulings and their implications on legal precedents. Visitors will find detailed articles, expert commentary, and video interviews with attorneys discussing landmark cases and emerging legal trends. Stay informed about the evolving landscape of law and how court decisions affect various practice areas and the rights of individuals.

133 posts

What is the burden of proof for someone challenging an agency’s decision?

January 5, 2025 • By Jack Gilbert

In most APA cases, the challenger bears the burden of proof and must show the agency action is unlawful under a deferential standard (often “arbitrary and capricious”). Courts generally presume the agency acted properly and review the administrative record rather than retrying facts. This article explains the main standards of review, common arguments, and when […]

Alternative Dispute Resolution Civil Law

How are changes in civil procedure affecting case outcomes?

January 4, 2025 • By Jack Gilbert

Recent FRCP amendments—most notably the 2015 proportionality changes to Rule 26 and the narrowed spoliation sanctions in Rule 37(e)—are measurably shifting outcomes by reducing discovery costs and limiting sanctions leverage. Courts are enforcing earlier case management and targeted ESI discovery, which can speed settlements or increase dismissal pressure. This article explains the key rule changes […]

Civil Law Civil Litigation

Filing a Lawsuit: What You Need to Know Before Suing

January 1, 2025 • By Jack Gilbert

Before filing a lawsuit, confirm you have a valid legal claim, filed within the statute of limitations, and enough evidence to prove damages. Most cases begin by identifying the right court and defendant, evaluating costs and alternatives like settlement, and preparing a complaint that meets strict procedural rules. This article explains key pre-suit steps, deadlines, […]

Appeals Civil Law

Can a decision be overturned simply because it is unpopular or controversial?

December 30, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

No—0 U.S. court decisions can be overturned solely because they are unpopular or controversial. Reversal generally requires legal error, constitutional conflict, new controlling precedent, or proper appellate or legislative action. This article explains how appeals, precedent, and public opinion interact in overturning rulings. The question of whether a judicial decision can be overturned solely based […]

Civil Law Court Decision

Bench Trials vs. Jury Trials: Choosing Your Best Option

December 20, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

Bench trials are decided by a judge alone, while jury trials are decided by a panel of typically 6–12 jurors who must reach a verdict. Your choice can affect everything from trial length and cost to how evidence and credibility are evaluated. This article compares bench vs. jury trials, explains key pros and cons, and […]

Appeals Court Decision

Mistrial in Criminal Cases: Causes and Consequences

December 16, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

A mistrial in criminal cases ends the trial early and makes the proceedings legally invalid before a verdict. It commonly occurs due to a hung jury, juror misconduct, prosecutorial/defense error, or prejudicial evidence that undermines fairness. This article explains key causes, immediate court steps, and consequences like retrial, dismissal, or plea negotiations. A mistrial in […]

Administrative Law Appeals

Agency expertise and its impact on arbitrary and capricious determinations

December 16, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

Courts often uphold agency decisions under the “arbitrary and capricious” standard when the agency demonstrates relevant technical expertise and a reasoned explanation grounded in the record. That deference is strongest in complex, science- or policy-heavy matters, but it weakens when agencies fail to explain, ignore important evidence, or contradict prior positions without justification. This article […]

Administrative Law Appeals

What are the legal precedents that define arbitrary and capricious actions?

December 15, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

“Arbitrary and capricious” action is a core Administrative Procedure Act standard courts use to invalidate agency decisions that lack a rational explanation or ignore important evidence. Key U.S. Supreme Court precedents—including *Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Ass’n v. State Farm* and *FCC v. Fox Television Stations*—require reasoned decisionmaking and a record-based justification. This article summarizes the leading […]

Administrative Law Appeals

What is required to prove that an agency’s decision is arbitrary and capricious?

December 15, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

To prove an agency decision is “arbitrary and capricious” under the APA, you must show the agency lacked a rational basis—failing to consider important factors, relying on irrelevant considerations, ignoring evidence, or inadequately explaining its choice. Courts generally uphold agency action if the record shows reasoned decision-making, but will set it aside when the agency’s […]

Appeals Court Decision

Arraignment Process: Your First Court Appearance Explained

December 14, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

An arraignment is your first court appearance after an arrest, where the judge reads the charges, advises your rights, takes your plea, and may set bail. It typically happens within 24–72 hours, depending on the jurisdiction and weekends/holidays. This article explains each step, what to bring, and how an attorney can protect you. The arraignment […]

Civil Litigation Constitutional Law

Meta Case at Supreme Court: Unexpected Withdrawal Without Ruling

December 5, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

The Meta Supreme Court case was withdrawn before the Court issued any ruling on Section 230. That leaves existing platform-liability precedent in place and delays clarity on social media content moderation standards. This article explains what the withdrawal means, why it matters, and what could happen next. In a surprising turn of events, the highly […]

Civil Litigation Constitutional Law

Supreme Court Bar Future: Sullivan & Cromwell’s Morgan Ratner in Spotlight

December 5, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

Morgan Ratner of Sullivan & Cromwell is emerging as a leading next‑generation Supreme Court advocate at one of the nation’s top firms. Her ascent reflects a shifting Supreme Court bar where new litigators are gaining prominence in high‑stakes appellate work. This article examines Ratner’s role and what it signals for the future of Supreme Court […]

← Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 12 Next →