Facing drug possession charges for the first time can be an overwhelming experience. The penalties for drug possession vary significantly across states, with some jurisdictions imposing harsh sentences even for first-time offenders while others offer various paths to rehabilitation and record clearance. Understanding the range of defense options available to those charged with first-time drug possession is crucial for anyone navigating this complex legal terrain. This comprehensive guide examines state-by-state penalties and explores effective strategies to fight drug charges.
The American criminal justice system’s approach to drug offenses has evolved over time, with many states now recognizing that first-time offenders often benefit more from treatment and rehabilitation than incarceration. However, the legal landscape remains uneven, with significant variations in how different jurisdictions handle drug possession cases. Whether you’re facing charges yourself or seeking to understand the system better, knowledge of these differences and available defense strategies is essential for making informed decisions.
Understanding Drug Classification and Possession Laws
Drug possession laws in the United States operate within a framework that categorizes controlled substances based on their potential for abuse, accepted medical use, and safety profile. The federal government and most states use a scheduling system that classifies drugs from Schedule I (highest potential for abuse, no accepted medical use) to Schedule V (lowest potential for abuse, accepted medical uses). This classification significantly impacts the penalties associated with possession.
Controlled substance laws define possession as having physical control over a drug or having it within your dominion and control, such as in your home, car, or personal belongings. Possession can be actual (the drug is on your person) or constructive (you have control over the area where the drug is found). For a conviction, prosecutors typically must prove that you knowingly possessed the substance and were aware of its illegal nature.
The quantity of the drug in question also plays a crucial role in determining charges and potential penalties. While simple possession generally refers to amounts consistent with personal use, larger quantities may lead to enhanced charges based on presumed intent to distribute. These distinctions are critical, as they can mean the difference between misdemeanor and felony charges, with corresponding differences in potential jail time, fines, and long-term consequences.
First Offense Drug Possession Penalties: State-by-State Overview
The penalties for first-time drug possession vary dramatically across states, reflecting different approaches to drug policy and criminal justice. Some states have moved toward decriminalization or diversion programs, while others maintain strict penalties even for first offenses.
In states like California, first-time possession of small amounts of most controlled substances can be charged as a misdemeanor, with penalties including up to one year in county jail and fines. However, California also offers various diversion programs that allow first-time offenders to avoid criminal convictions by completing treatment programs. Similarly, states like Massachusetts and Washington have implemented progressive approaches that prioritize treatment over punishment for first-time offenders.
In contrast, states such as Texas and Florida generally maintain stricter approaches. In Texas, even first-time possession of small amounts of controlled substances like cocaine or methamphetamine can result in felony charges carrying potential prison sentences. The classification of the offense depends on the type and amount of drug involved, with penalties ranging from 180 days to 2 years for state jail felonies to 2-10 years for second-degree felonies.
Some states have implemented specific threshold amounts that determine whether possession is charged as a misdemeanor or felony. For example, in Ohio, possession of less than 5 grams of cocaine is a fifth-degree felony with penalties of 6-12 months imprisonment and up to $2,500 in fines. The classification and penalties increase with the weight, with possession of 100 grams or more constituting a first-degree felony carrying mandatory prison time.
It’s worth noting that several states have recently enacted significant reforms. Oregon became the first state to decriminalize possession of small amounts of all scheduled drugs for personal use through Ballot Measure 110 in 2020. This approach removes criminal penalties for drug possession and instead refers individuals to treatment and recovery services. Vermont has taken a more targeted approach, specifically decriminalizing possession of non-prescribed buprenorphine, a medication used to treat opioid use disorder.
Challenging the Evidence: Fourth Amendment Defenses
One of the most effective strategies in drug possession defense involves challenging the legality of how evidence was obtained. The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, providing a constitutional foundation for challenging evidence in drug cases.
If law enforcement conducted a search without a valid warrant, probable cause, or an applicable exception to the warrant requirement, any evidence obtained may be deemed inadmissible in court. This legal principle, known as the exclusionary rule, can effectively dismantle the prosecution’s case when properly applied. Common scenarios where Fourth Amendment violations occur include warrantless searches of homes, improper traffic stops, searches extending beyond the scope of consent, and searches based on insufficient probable cause.
To successfully challenge evidence on Fourth Amendment grounds, defense attorneys typically file a motion to suppress, arguing that the evidence was obtained in violation of constitutional rights. If the court grants this motion, the prosecution cannot use the suppressed evidence at trial. In many drug possession cases, this effectively leads to dismissal of charges, as the physical evidence of the drugs themselves is essential to the prosecution’s case.
Recent court decisions have refined the application of Fourth Amendment protections in drug cases. For example, courts have addressed issues such as the use of drug-sniffing dogs during traffic stops, the circumstances under which officers can search vehicles or containers within vehicles, and the legality of searches incident to arrest. Staying informed about these evolving legal standards is crucial for developing effective defense strategies.
Lack of Knowledge or Control Defenses
Another common defense strategy in drug possession cases involves challenging the prosecution’s claim that the defendant knowingly possessed the controlled substance. This approach can be particularly effective in cases involving shared spaces, vehicles, or situations where drugs were found in proximity to the defendant but not on their person.
To secure a conviction, prosecutors must typically prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knew about the presence of the drugs and exercised control over them. If the defense can create reasonable doubt about either of these elements, it may lead to acquittal. For example, if drugs were found in a shared vehicle or apartment, the defense might argue that they belonged to someone else and the defendant had no knowledge of their presence.
The “momentary possession” defense represents another variation of this approach. This defense argues that the defendant only possessed the drugs briefly and without criminal intent. For example, someone who finds drugs and picks them up intending to dispose of them properly might assert momentary possession as a defense. To be successful, this defense typically requires demonstrating both brief possession and a clear intent to dispose of the substances rather than use or distribute them.
In some jurisdictions, defendants may also argue that they possessed a substance they genuinely believed to be legal, only to discover later that it contained controlled substances. This “mistake of fact” defense challenges the knowledge element required for conviction. However, its effectiveness varies by jurisdiction, as some states apply a strict liability standard to drug possession offenses.
Challenging Drug Testing and Chain of Custody
The reliability of field tests and laboratory analysis presents another avenue for defense in drug possession cases. Law enforcement often relies on presumptive field tests to identify suspected illegal substances during arrests, but these tests have been shown to produce false positives in numerous instances, mistaking legal substances for illicit drugs.
Defense attorneys increasingly challenge the accuracy of these preliminary tests, arguing for more rigorous laboratory analysis before proceeding with charges. Even when laboratory testing is conducted, issues with testing protocols, equipment calibration, or analyst qualifications may provide grounds for challenging the results. Expert witnesses can play a crucial role in identifying and explaining these potential problems to judges and juries.
The chain of custody for drug evidence represents another critical area for scrutiny. From the moment of seizure until presentation in court, drug evidence must be properly documented, stored, and handled to prevent contamination, tampering, or misidentification. Any gaps in this documentation or evidence of improper handling may undermine the prosecution’s case.
For example, if the defense can show that evidence was stored improperly, potentially leading to degradation or contamination, or that there were periods when the evidence was unaccounted for, this may create reasonable doubt about whether the substance presented in court is the same one allegedly found in the defendant’s possession. These technical challenges require thorough investigation and often benefit from specialized knowledge of evidence handling procedures.
Diversion Programs and Alternative Sentencing
Many jurisdictions now offer drug diversion programs as alternatives to traditional prosecution for first-time offenders. These programs typically allow defendants to avoid criminal convictions by completing treatment, education, and community service requirements. Upon successful completion, charges may be dismissed or reduced, preserving the defendant’s criminal record.
Eligibility criteria for diversion programs vary by jurisdiction but often include having no prior drug convictions, being charged with simple possession rather than distribution or manufacturing, and demonstrating a willingness to participate in treatment. Some programs require participants to plead guilty initially, with the plea set aside upon program completion, while others defer prosecution entirely pending program completion.
California’s PC 1000 program exemplifies this approach, offering deferred entry of judgment for eligible first-time, nonviolent drug offenders. Participants typically complete drug treatment or education programs, serve probation for 1-3 years, and pay court fees and fines. If they fulfill these requirements, the judge dismisses the charges, and participants can then petition to have their arrest records sealed.
Beyond formal diversion programs, courts may consider various alternative sentencing options for first-time drug offenders. These might include probation with treatment conditions, community service, drug courts that provide intensive supervision and support, or conditional discharge programs that dismiss charges after a period of compliance with court-ordered conditions. Defense attorneys often negotiate for these alternatives by emphasizing factors such as the defendant’s lack of criminal history, willingness to address substance use issues, and ties to the community.
Plea Bargaining Strategies for First Offenders
For first-time offenders facing drug charges, plea bargaining often represents a practical path to minimizing consequences. Prosecutors may be willing to reduce charges or recommend lenient sentences for various reasons, including overcrowded court dockets, evidentiary weaknesses, or recognition that rehabilitation serves public safety better than incarceration in many first-offense cases.
Common plea arrangements include reducing felony charges to misdemeanors, which can significantly impact both immediate penalties and long-term consequences. In some jurisdictions, prosecutors may offer to reduce drug possession charges to lesser offenses like possession of drug paraphernalia or even non-drug-related charges like disorderly conduct. These reductions can help defendants avoid the most severe collateral consequences of drug convictions, such as loss of professional licenses or housing opportunities.
Another common approach involves negotiating for “wobbler” offenses to be treated as misdemeanors rather than felonies. In states like California, certain drug offenses are designated as wobblers, meaning they can be charged as either felonies or misdemeanors depending on the circumstances and the prosecutor’s discretion. Factors that may influence these negotiations include the quantity of drugs involved, the defendant’s personal circumstances and criminal history, and their willingness to participate in treatment programs.
Effective plea negotiations require understanding both the legal landscape and the particular policies and priorities of local prosecutors’ offices. Defense attorneys typically assess the strength of the evidence, identify potential weaknesses in the prosecution’s case, and leverage mitigating factors to negotiate the most favorable terms possible. For first-time offenders, emphasizing rehabilitation potential and the absence of prior criminal history can be particularly effective negotiating points.
Prescription Drug Defenses
Cases involving prescription medications present unique defense opportunities. While possessing controlled substances without a valid prescription is generally illegal, various defenses may apply in cases involving prescription drugs. The most straightforward defense is demonstrating that you had a valid prescription for the medication in question, issued by a licensed healthcare provider for a legitimate medical purpose.
However, even with a valid prescription, certain circumstances may still lead to charges. These include possessing quantities that exceed the prescribed amount, using the medication in ways inconsistent with the prescription (such as crushing and snorting pills meant to be taken orally), or possessing prescription medications prescribed to someone else. In these cases, defense strategies must address these specific issues.
For defendants charged with possessing someone else’s prescription medication, defenses might include lack of knowledge (not realizing the medication belonged to someone else) or necessity in emergency situations. Some jurisdictions recognize limited exceptions for possessing family members’ medications in certain circumstances, though these exceptions vary widely by state.
The defense approach in prescription drug cases often involves educating prosecutors and judges about the defendant’s medical conditions, treatment history, and legitimate need for medication. Medical documentation, testimony from healthcare providers, and evidence of compliance with treatment plans can all support these defenses. In some cases, demonstrating that possession resulted from a misunderstanding rather than criminal intent may lead to reduced charges or diversion opportunities.
Medical and Recreational Marijuana Considerations
The legal landscape surrounding marijuana possession has changed dramatically in recent years, with many states legalizing medical marijuana and a growing number permitting recreational use. However, these changes have created a complex patchwork of laws that vary significantly by state and sometimes conflict with federal law, which still classifies marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance.
In states with legal medical marijuana, patients with qualifying conditions can typically possess specified amounts without criminal liability, provided they comply with state registration requirements and possession limits. However, even in these states, possession without proper documentation or exceeding permitted amounts can still result in criminal charges. Defense strategies in such cases often focus on demonstrating compliance with state medical marijuana laws or challenging any procedural deficiencies in the state’s medical marijuana program.
States that have legalized recreational marijuana typically establish possession limits for adults, with criminal penalties still applying to possession by minors or possession exceeding legal limits. Defense strategies in these jurisdictions might involve demonstrating that possession fell within legal limits or challenging the accuracy of weight measurements.
The interaction between state marijuana laws and federal prohibition creates additional complexities, particularly in areas of federal jurisdiction such as national parks, military bases, or public housing. While federal prosecution for simple possession has become rare in states with legalization, it remains legally possible. Defense strategies must account for these jurisdictional issues and the specific legal status of marijuana in the relevant location.
Interstate Travel and Jurisdiction Issues
Interstate travel adds another layer of complexity to drug possession cases, particularly when substances legal in one state are illegal in another. This issue has become increasingly relevant as states adopt divergent approaches to marijuana and other substances. Individuals traveling between states may unwittingly violate local laws by transporting substances that were legally obtained in their home state.
When facing charges for possessing substances that crossed state lines, defendants may encounter both state and federal jurisdiction issues. Federal charges may apply if the substances were transported across state lines, potentially resulting in more severe penalties than state charges. Additionally, the federal government may have jurisdiction over cases involving interstate highways or other federal territories.
Defense strategies in these cases often involve demonstrating lack of intent to violate local laws and arguing for prosecutorial discretion based on the unique circumstances of interstate travel. For example, defense attorneys might argue that a defendant was unaware of differences in state laws or had no criminal intent when traveling with medication legally prescribed in their home state.
For commercial drivers and others who regularly cross state lines, these issues present particular challenges. Commercial drivers face stricter regulations regarding controlled substances and may face both criminal charges and professional consequences for drug possession, even if the substances were legally obtained in another jurisdiction. Defense strategies must address both the criminal charges and potential impacts on professional licensing.
Collateral Consequences and Record Clearance
Beyond the immediate legal penalties, drug convictions carry significant collateral consequences that can affect employment, housing, education, and other opportunities. For first-time offenders, understanding these potential long-term impacts is crucial when considering defense strategies and plea options.
Drug convictions can result in the loss of professional licenses, disqualification from certain employment opportunities, ineligibility for federal student aid, restrictions on housing options, and immigration consequences for non-citizens. These collateral consequences often last far longer than the formal criminal penalties and can have a more significant impact on a person’s life trajectory.
Given these stakes, many defense strategies focus not only on avoiding conviction but also on preserving future opportunities. This might involve negotiating for charges that carry fewer collateral consequences or pursuing diversion programs that result in dismissed charges. In some jurisdictions, first-time offenders may qualify for deferred adjudication or conditional discharge programs that allow for eventual record clearance upon successful completion of program requirements.
For those who do face convictions, various record clearance options may be available depending on the jurisdiction. These include expungement, record sealing, and certificates of rehabilitation. Eligibility criteria typically include completing all terms of the sentence, maintaining a clean record for a specified period, and sometimes demonstrating rehabilitation. While record clearance doesn’t erase the conviction entirely, it can significantly reduce its impact on future opportunities by limiting public access to the record and sometimes restoring certain rights and privileges.
Recent Trends in Drug Possession Laws and Enforcement
The landscape of drug policy continues to evolve, with significant implications for those facing first-time possession charges. Several states have implemented reforms that reduce or eliminate criminal penalties for possession of small amounts of certain substances, reflecting a growing recognition of the limitations of punitive approaches to addressing substance use.
Oregon’s groundbreaking approach, implemented through Ballot Measure 110 in 2020, decriminalized possession of small amounts of all scheduled drugs for personal use. Instead of criminal penalties, individuals found with personal-use amounts face civil violations resulting in $100 fines, which can be waived by completing health assessments. The measure also established a drug treatment and recovery program funded by marijuana tax revenue.
Vermont took a more targeted approach by becoming the first state to specifically decriminalize possession of non-prescribed buprenorphine, a medication used to treat opioid use disorder. This reform recognizes the life-saving potential of this medication and aims to reduce barriers to treatment for those struggling with opioid addiction.
These reforms reflect broader shifts in how many jurisdictions approach drug policy, with increasing emphasis on public health approaches rather than criminal punishment. This trend has implications even in states that maintain criminal penalties, as prosecutors and judges may exercise greater discretion in handling first-time possession cases, particularly when defendants demonstrate willingness to engage in treatment.
Technological developments have also influenced drug possession cases, with advances in drug testing methods, body-worn cameras, and other surveillance technologies creating both challenges and opportunities for defense strategies. Body camera footage may contradict officer testimony or reveal procedural violations during searches and arrests, while advances in testing technology may provide both more accurate results and new avenues for challenging evidence.
Building an Effective Defense Team
Navigating the complexities of drug possession charges requires specialized knowledge and skills. Building an effective defense team typically begins with securing representation from a criminal defense attorney with specific experience in drug cases. These attorneys understand the nuances of search and seizure law, drug testing protocols, and available diversion programs in their jurisdictions.
When selecting an attorney, factors to consider include their familiarity with local courts and prosecutors, track record in similar cases, and approach to defense strategy. Initial consultations provide opportunities to assess whether an attorney’s style and strategy align with your goals and circumstances. Most defense attorneys offer free initial consultations to discuss potential approaches to your case.
In complex cases, defense teams may include additional specialists such as forensic experts who can challenge drug testing procedures, investigators who can interview witnesses and gather evidence, or addiction specialists who can provide context for a defendant’s actions and treatment needs. Expert witnesses can play crucial roles in creating reasonable doubt or supporting alternative explanations for possession.
For defendants with substance use disorders, incorporating treatment providers into the defense strategy can demonstrate commitment to addressing underlying issues. This approach not only supports health and recovery but may also positively influence legal outcomes by showing judges and prosecutors that the defendant is taking proactive steps toward rehabilitation.
Preparing for Your First Court Appearance
The period immediately following an arrest for drug possession involves critical decisions that can significantly impact case outcomes. Understanding what to expect and how to prepare for initial court appearances can help defendants navigate this challenging time more effectively.
After arrest, defendants typically face an initial appearance or arraignment where charges are formally presented, and bail or release conditions are determined. At this stage, it’s important to avoid discussing the case with anyone other than your attorney, as statements to law enforcement, cellmates, or others may later be used as evidence. Exercise your right to remain silent and request an attorney if questioned about the case.
Before the first court appearance, gather any documentation that might support arguments for release on recognizance or reasonable bail. This might include proof of employment, community ties, lack of prior criminal history, or enrollment in treatment programs. If you have a valid prescription for any medications involved in the case, locate documentation to provide to your attorney.
During the arraignment, you’ll be asked to enter a plea. In most cases, pleading not guilty at this stage preserves all defense options while your attorney investigates the case and negotiates with prosecutors. Accepting a plea deal at arraignment without thorough case review and legal advice rarely serves defendants’ interests, even for first-time offenders.
If released pending trial, strictly adhere to all conditions set by the court. These might include drug testing, treatment participation, travel restrictions, or regular check-ins with pretrial services. Violations of these conditions can result in revocation of release and may negatively impact the ultimate case outcome.
Conclusion
Facing drug possession charges as a first-time offender presents significant challenges but also various opportunities for favorable resolutions. The wide variation in state laws and penalties makes understanding your specific jurisdiction’s approach essential for developing effective defense strategies. From challenging the evidence on constitutional grounds to pursuing diversion programs that focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment, multiple pathways exist for minimizing the impact of these charges.
The evolving landscape of drug policy in the United States reflects growing recognition that substance use issues often respond better to treatment approaches than to incarceration. This shift has expanded options for first-time offenders in many jurisdictions, though significant disparities remain in how different states handle drug possession cases. Staying informed about these developments and working with knowledgeable legal counsel provides the best foundation for navigating this complex terrain.
Ultimately, the goal for most first-time offenders extends beyond merely resolving immediate charges to preserving future opportunities and addressing any underlying substance use issues. With proper legal guidance, many first-time offenders can achieve outcomes that allow them to move forward without the burden of a permanent criminal record, while accessing resources that support long-term health and success.
Citations:
- https://www.ajc.state.ak.us/acjc/docs/resources/drugs/misdechrt.pdf
- https://thenieveslawfirm.com/first-offense-drug-charges-dropped/
- https://atx.legal/first-time-drug-possession-in-texas/
- https://www.mvsllp.com/blog/2022/october/understanding-how-to-beat-a-drug-possession-char/
- https://www.ericbenavides.com/how-to-fight-drug-charges-effective-defense-strategies/
- https://nashp.org/state-policy-actions-to-decriminalize-controlled-substances/
- https://galelawgroup.com/7-criminal-defense-strategies-for-drug-possession-charges/
- https://www.justia.com/criminal/offenses/drug-crimes/drug-possession-laws-50-state-survey/
- https://www.ecattorneys.law/blog/2024/may/drug-possession-defense-strategies/
- https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/blog/how-to-get-a-possession-charge-dismissed/
- https://www.lawinfo.com/resources/drug-crime/criminal-defense-strategies-for-drug-charges.html
- https://recovered.org/drug-offense-resources/drug-possession-laws
- https://attorneys.media/drug-possession-defense-strategies/
- https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/training/primers/2024_Primer_Drugs.pdf
- https://sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Drug-Free-Zone-Laws.pdf
- https://mrsc.org/stay-informed/mrsc-insight/may-2023/new-law-on-drug-possession-use
- https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/crime-penalties/federal/Possession-Controlled-Substance.htm
- https://www.findlaw.com/state/criminal-laws/drug-possession.html
- https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-charges/drug-possession-penalties-and-sentencing.html
- https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb19-1263
- https://www.tdcaa.com/journal/an-at-a-glance-chart-of-punishments-for-drug-possession-delivery-and-manufacture/
- https://www.findlaw.com/state/criminal-laws/marijuana-possession-laws-by-state.html
- https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/magistrates-court/item/supplying-or-offering-to-supply-a-controlled-drug-possession-of-a-controlled-drug-with-intent-to-supply-it-to-another-for-consultation-only/
- https://brandonwhitelaw.com/blog/how-to-get-felony-charges-dismissed
- https://attorneys.media/drug-possession-laws-explained/
- https://www.bestlawhb.com/understanding-drug-possession-laws-in-tennessee/
- https://jsberrylaw.com/blog/how-do-i-fight-a-possession-with-intent-to-distribute-charge/
- https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-charges/drug-possession-defenses.html
- https://www.goodpeopledogetarrested.com/blog/2024/04/defense-strategies-for-first-time-drug-offense-charges/
- https://jsberrylaw.com/blog/how-do-i-fight-a-felony-drug-charge/
- https://federalcriminaldefense.pro/blog/how-long-do-you-go-to-jail-for-drug-possession/
- https://wesruckerlaw.com/possible-drug-possession-charge-defenses-houston/
- https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/what-can-i-expect-as-a-first-offender-on-drug-poss-4681620.html
- https://www.pattonandpittman.com/blog/2023/august/important-factors-to-consider-in-a-drug-possessi/
- https://www.fryelawgroup.com/beat-possession-charge-georgia/
- https://www.alariddefense.com/blog/exploring-common-drug-defense-strategies
- https://futurefirst.law/drug-possession-defense-strategies-az/
- https://www.aclu.org/issues/criminal-law-reform/drug-law-reform
- https://www.jacksonvillecriminaldefenseattorneyblog.net/recent-developments-defending-drug-possession-cases/
- https://www.nacdl.org/Landing/DrugLaw
- https://www.pewresearch.org/topic/politics-policy/political-issues/drug-policy/
- https://www.devorelawoffice.com/how-criminal-defense-lawyers-handle-drug-charges-and-defenses/
- https://www.mckameydefenselaw.com/protecting-your-rights-defense-strategies-for-drug-possession-charges/
- https://www.dea.gov/drug-information/drug-policy
- https://friedmancriminallaw.com/2024/10/08/what-are-possible-defense-strategies-against-drug-charges/
- https://federalcriminaldefense.pro/blog/the-most-common-federal-drug-charges-and-how-to-defend-against-them/
- https://drugpolicy.org
- https://police.unc.edu/about/drug-and-alcohol-prevention-program-report/federal-state-local/
- https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/criminal-defense/drug-charges/possession-controlled-substance-hawaii
- https://spu.edu/-/media/university-leadership/student-life/Summary-of-Federal-and-State-Drug-Laws-as-of-5-6-16.ashx
- https://www.standardcollege.edu/campus-safety/federal-alcohol-drug-penalties/
- https://www.dea.gov/sites/default/files/2021-12/Trafficking%20Penalties.pdf
- https://www.kenstoverlaw.com/blog/2022/june/4-defenses-you-can-use-against-a-drug-possession/
- https://www.ringstromlaw.com/practice-areas/federal/drug-possession
- https://drugpolicy.org/issue/prioritize-health-end-criminal-penalties/
- https://sbbllaw.com/federal-drug-crime-lawyer/
- https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/drug-policy-reform/
English 
Español de México