Legal systems across the United States are grappling with the challenge of addressing fraudulent activities on social media platforms. As these digital spaces have become integral to modern communication and commerce, they have also emerged as fertile ground for various forms of deception and criminal conduct. The legal framework for combating social media fraud is multifaceted, involving federal and state laws, regulatory actions, and evolving jurisprudence that seeks to balance free speech protections with the need to safeguard consumers and maintain the integrity of online interactions.
At the federal level, several statutes form the backbone of legal efforts to combat social media fraud. The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), originally enacted in 1986 and subsequently amended, serves as a primary tool for prosecutors dealing with unauthorized access to computer systems, including those used by social media platforms. While initially focused on protecting government and financial institution computers, the CFAA’s scope has expanded to encompass a wide range of cyber-related offenses that often manifest on social media platforms.
The Federal Trade Commission Act provides another critical mechanism for addressing fraudulent activities on social media. Under this law, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has broad authority to combat “unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce.” This mandate has been increasingly applied to the digital realm, with the FTC taking action against companies and individuals engaged in deceptive practices on social media platforms. In March 2023, the FTC issued orders to eight major social media and video streaming platforms, seeking information on how these companies scrutinize and restrict paid commercial advertising that is deceptive or exposes consumers to fraudulent products and scams.
The FTC’s actions reflect a growing recognition of the scale and impact of social media fraud. In 2022 alone, consumers reported losing more than $1.2 billion to fraud that originated on social media platforms, surpassing any other contact method. This staggering figure underscores the urgency of developing effective legal and regulatory responses to the problem.
State laws also play a crucial role in addressing social media fraud. Many states have enacted legislation specifically targeting online deception and fraud, often with provisions that directly address social media platforms. For example, in December 2024, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed a legislative package designed to strengthen protections for consumers’ personal data. This package included measures requiring social media companies to post clear terms of service and submit reports to the state attorney general, as well as prohibiting the use of social media websites for debt collection.
The legal approach to combating social media fraud often involves a combination of criminal prosecution and civil enforcement actions. Criminal charges may be brought under various federal statutes, including wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343), which has been adapted to address fraudulent schemes conducted via electronic communications, including social media. Identity theft (18 U.S.C. § 1028) and credit card fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1029) are other common charges in cases involving social media-based scams.
Civil enforcement actions, often led by the FTC or state attorneys general, can result in injunctions, monetary penalties, and orders for consumer redress. These actions serve not only to punish wrongdoers but also to deter future misconduct and establish precedents for responsible business practices on social media platforms.
The legal system’s approach to social media fraud must also contend with the unique challenges posed by the digital environment. The anonymity and global reach of social media platforms can make it difficult to identify and prosecute perpetrators. Moreover, the rapid evolution of technology and the emergence of new forms of deception, such as deepfakes and AI-generated content, require constant adaptation of legal strategies.
One area of particular concern is the proliferation of fake accounts and bot networks used to amplify fraudulent content or create the illusion of social proof. In August 2024, the FTC announced a final rule banning the sale or purchase of fake reviews and testimonials, including prohibitions on the sale or purchase of fake indicators of social media influence, such as bot-generated followers or views. This rule represents a significant step in addressing a pervasive form of social media deception that can have substantial economic impacts on consumers and businesses alike.
The legal system’s approach to social media fraud must also navigate complex issues of platform liability and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. This provision, which generally shields online platforms from liability for user-generated content, has been the subject of intense debate and legal scrutiny. While Section 230 has been credited with fostering innovation and free expression online, critics argue that it has also allowed social media companies to avoid responsibility for harmful content on their platforms, including fraudulent activities.
Recent legal developments have begun to chip away at the broad immunity provided by Section 230, particularly in cases involving the promotion or facilitation of illegal activities. Courts have increasingly recognized exceptions to Section 230 immunity, especially when platforms play an active role in creating or developing unlawful content. This evolving jurisprudence may provide new avenues for holding social media companies accountable for fraudulent activities on their platforms.
The legal system’s response to social media fraud also intersects with broader privacy and data protection concerns. Many fraudulent schemes on social media rely on the exploitation of personal data, either through unauthorized access or through the misuse of information willingly shared by users. Laws such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and its successor, the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), establish important frameworks for data protection that can help mitigate the risk of fraud. These laws grant consumers greater control over their personal information and impose obligations on businesses to implement reasonable security measures.
International cooperation is another critical aspect of legal efforts to combat social media fraud. The global nature of social media platforms means that fraudulent activities often cross national borders, requiring coordination between law enforcement agencies and regulatory bodies in different jurisdictions. Initiatives such as the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime provide frameworks for international cooperation in investigating and prosecuting cyber-related offenses, including those perpetrated through social media.
The legal system’s approach to social media fraud must also address the unique vulnerabilities of certain populations. Children and elderly individuals are often targeted by fraudsters on social media platforms, necessitating specialized legal protections. The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) establishes important safeguards for children under 13, but there is ongoing debate about whether these protections are sufficient in the age of social media. Similarly, efforts to protect elderly users from social media scams have led to the development of specific legal and educational initiatives at both the federal and state levels.
One emerging area of legal concern is the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning technologies in perpetrating social media fraud. As these technologies become more sophisticated, they can be used to create highly convincing fake profiles, generate realistic but false content, and automate large-scale fraudulent operations. The legal system is still in the early stages of developing effective responses to AI-enabled fraud, but this is likely to be an area of significant focus in the coming years.
The role of whistleblowers in exposing fraudulent activities on social media platforms has also gained legal significance. Laws such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act provide protections for individuals who report corporate wrongdoing, including fraud. These protections may extend to employees of social media companies who come forward with information about fraudulent activities or inadequate safeguards against fraud on their platforms.
The legal system’s approach to social media fraud must also consider the potential chilling effect on free speech and legitimate online activities. Overly broad or aggressive enforcement actions could inadvertently suppress protected speech or hinder innovation in the digital space. Courts and legislators must therefore strike a delicate balance between protecting consumers from fraud and preserving the open and dynamic nature of social media platforms.
One strategy that has gained traction in addressing social media fraud is the concept of “know your customer” (KYC) requirements, similar to those used in the financial sector. Some legal experts and policymakers have proposed extending KYC principles to social media platforms, requiring them to verify the identity of users, particularly those engaged in commercial activities or with large followings. While such measures could help combat fraud, they also raise privacy concerns and could potentially limit anonymous speech online.
The legal system’s response to social media fraud also involves education and empowerment of consumers. Many jurisdictions have implemented laws requiring social media companies to provide clear and accessible information about their privacy policies, terms of service, and mechanisms for reporting fraudulent activities. For example, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) includes provisions mandating transparency and user control over personal data, which can help users make informed decisions and better protect themselves against fraud.
Another important aspect of the legal approach to social media fraud is the regulation of influencer marketing. As social media influencers have become powerful marketing channels, concerns have arisen about undisclosed sponsorships and misleading endorsements. The FTC has issued guidelines requiring clear disclosure of material connections between influencers and the products or services they promote, and has taken enforcement actions against both influencers and brands for deceptive practices.
The intersection of securities law and social media fraud presents unique challenges for the legal system. The rise of investment advice and stock promotion on social media platforms has led to concerns about market manipulation and fraud. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued guidance on the use of social media for corporate disclosures and has brought enforcement actions against individuals and companies for fraudulent investment schemes promoted on social media platforms.
The legal system must also address the role of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology in social media fraud. These technologies have been used both as tools for perpetrating fraud (e.g., cryptocurrency scams promoted on social media) and as potential solutions for enhancing trust and verification in online interactions. Regulatory bodies such as the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) are working to develop appropriate legal frameworks for cryptocurrency-related activities, including those that intersect with social media platforms.
One emerging area of legal focus is the concept of “digital identity” and its role in combating social media fraud. Some jurisdictions are exploring the development of secure, verifiable digital identity systems that could be used across various online platforms, including social media. While such systems could help reduce fraud and impersonation, they also raise complex legal and ethical questions about privacy, data ownership, and the right to anonymity online.
The legal system’s approach to social media fraud must also consider the global nature of these platforms and the potential for conflicting legal standards across jurisdictions. For example, the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) imposes new obligations on large online platforms to combat illegal content and disinformation, which could include certain forms of social media fraud. As different regions implement varying regulatory approaches, social media companies face the challenge of complying with a patchwork of legal requirements.
Another important legal consideration in addressing social media fraud is the potential liability of third-party service providers, such as payment processors or advertising networks, that may inadvertently facilitate fraudulent activities. Courts have grappled with questions of secondary liability in various contexts, and the extent to which these principles apply to social media fraud cases is still evolving.
The legal system’s response to social media fraud also intersects with broader efforts to combat cybercrime. Many of the techniques used in social media fraud, such as phishing or identity theft, are part of larger cybercriminal operations. Laws such as the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA) aim to improve information sharing between private companies and government agencies to better detect and prevent cyber threats, including those manifesting on social media platforms.
As the legal landscape continues to evolve, there is ongoing debate about the need for comprehensive federal legislation specifically addressing social media fraud. While existing laws provide some tools for combating these issues, proponents of new legislation argue that a more targeted approach is necessary to address the unique challenges posed by social media platforms.
In conclusion, the legal system’s approach to addressing fraudulent activities on social media is multifaceted and rapidly evolving. It involves a complex interplay of federal and state laws, regulatory actions, and judicial interpretations, all aimed at protecting consumers and maintaining the integrity of online interactions. As social media platforms continue to play an increasingly central role in commerce, communication, and public discourse, the legal framework for combating fraud in these spaces will undoubtedly continue to develop and adapt to new challenges.
Website citations used for this article:
English 
Español de México
How Do Legal Systems Address Fraudulent Activities on Social Media?
Home » Blog » Criminal Law » Cyber Crime » How Do Legal Systems Address Fraudulent Activities on Social Media?
Video Categories
Legal systems across the United States are grappling with the challenge of addressing fraudulent activities on social media platforms. As these digital spaces have become integral to modern communication and commerce, they have also emerged as fertile ground for various forms of deception and criminal conduct. The legal framework for combating social media fraud is multifaceted, involving federal and state laws, regulatory actions, and evolving jurisprudence that seeks to balance free speech protections with the need to safeguard consumers and maintain the integrity of online interactions.
At the federal level, several statutes form the backbone of legal efforts to combat social media fraud. The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), originally enacted in 1986 and subsequently amended, serves as a primary tool for prosecutors dealing with unauthorized access to computer systems, including those used by social media platforms. While initially focused on protecting government and financial institution computers, the CFAA’s scope has expanded to encompass a wide range of cyber-related offenses that often manifest on social media platforms.
The Federal Trade Commission Act provides another critical mechanism for addressing fraudulent activities on social media. Under this law, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has broad authority to combat “unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce.” This mandate has been increasingly applied to the digital realm, with the FTC taking action against companies and individuals engaged in deceptive practices on social media platforms. In March 2023, the FTC issued orders to eight major social media and video streaming platforms, seeking information on how these companies scrutinize and restrict paid commercial advertising that is deceptive or exposes consumers to fraudulent products and scams.
The FTC’s actions reflect a growing recognition of the scale and impact of social media fraud. In 2022 alone, consumers reported losing more than $1.2 billion to fraud that originated on social media platforms, surpassing any other contact method. This staggering figure underscores the urgency of developing effective legal and regulatory responses to the problem.
State laws also play a crucial role in addressing social media fraud. Many states have enacted legislation specifically targeting online deception and fraud, often with provisions that directly address social media platforms. For example, in December 2024, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed a legislative package designed to strengthen protections for consumers’ personal data. This package included measures requiring social media companies to post clear terms of service and submit reports to the state attorney general, as well as prohibiting the use of social media websites for debt collection.
The legal approach to combating social media fraud often involves a combination of criminal prosecution and civil enforcement actions. Criminal charges may be brought under various federal statutes, including wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343), which has been adapted to address fraudulent schemes conducted via electronic communications, including social media. Identity theft (18 U.S.C. § 1028) and credit card fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1029) are other common charges in cases involving social media-based scams.
Civil enforcement actions, often led by the FTC or state attorneys general, can result in injunctions, monetary penalties, and orders for consumer redress. These actions serve not only to punish wrongdoers but also to deter future misconduct and establish precedents for responsible business practices on social media platforms.
The legal system’s approach to social media fraud must also contend with the unique challenges posed by the digital environment. The anonymity and global reach of social media platforms can make it difficult to identify and prosecute perpetrators. Moreover, the rapid evolution of technology and the emergence of new forms of deception, such as deepfakes and AI-generated content, require constant adaptation of legal strategies.
One area of particular concern is the proliferation of fake accounts and bot networks used to amplify fraudulent content or create the illusion of social proof. In August 2024, the FTC announced a final rule banning the sale or purchase of fake reviews and testimonials, including prohibitions on the sale or purchase of fake indicators of social media influence, such as bot-generated followers or views. This rule represents a significant step in addressing a pervasive form of social media deception that can have substantial economic impacts on consumers and businesses alike.
The legal system’s approach to social media fraud must also navigate complex issues of platform liability and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. This provision, which generally shields online platforms from liability for user-generated content, has been the subject of intense debate and legal scrutiny. While Section 230 has been credited with fostering innovation and free expression online, critics argue that it has also allowed social media companies to avoid responsibility for harmful content on their platforms, including fraudulent activities.
Recent legal developments have begun to chip away at the broad immunity provided by Section 230, particularly in cases involving the promotion or facilitation of illegal activities. Courts have increasingly recognized exceptions to Section 230 immunity, especially when platforms play an active role in creating or developing unlawful content. This evolving jurisprudence may provide new avenues for holding social media companies accountable for fraudulent activities on their platforms.
The legal system’s response to social media fraud also intersects with broader privacy and data protection concerns. Many fraudulent schemes on social media rely on the exploitation of personal data, either through unauthorized access or through the misuse of information willingly shared by users. Laws such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and its successor, the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), establish important frameworks for data protection that can help mitigate the risk of fraud. These laws grant consumers greater control over their personal information and impose obligations on businesses to implement reasonable security measures.
International cooperation is another critical aspect of legal efforts to combat social media fraud. The global nature of social media platforms means that fraudulent activities often cross national borders, requiring coordination between law enforcement agencies and regulatory bodies in different jurisdictions. Initiatives such as the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime provide frameworks for international cooperation in investigating and prosecuting cyber-related offenses, including those perpetrated through social media.
The legal system’s approach to social media fraud must also address the unique vulnerabilities of certain populations. Children and elderly individuals are often targeted by fraudsters on social media platforms, necessitating specialized legal protections. The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) establishes important safeguards for children under 13, but there is ongoing debate about whether these protections are sufficient in the age of social media. Similarly, efforts to protect elderly users from social media scams have led to the development of specific legal and educational initiatives at both the federal and state levels.
One emerging area of legal concern is the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning technologies in perpetrating social media fraud. As these technologies become more sophisticated, they can be used to create highly convincing fake profiles, generate realistic but false content, and automate large-scale fraudulent operations. The legal system is still in the early stages of developing effective responses to AI-enabled fraud, but this is likely to be an area of significant focus in the coming years.
The role of whistleblowers in exposing fraudulent activities on social media platforms has also gained legal significance. Laws such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act provide protections for individuals who report corporate wrongdoing, including fraud. These protections may extend to employees of social media companies who come forward with information about fraudulent activities or inadequate safeguards against fraud on their platforms.
The legal system’s approach to social media fraud must also consider the potential chilling effect on free speech and legitimate online activities. Overly broad or aggressive enforcement actions could inadvertently suppress protected speech or hinder innovation in the digital space. Courts and legislators must therefore strike a delicate balance between protecting consumers from fraud and preserving the open and dynamic nature of social media platforms.
One strategy that has gained traction in addressing social media fraud is the concept of “know your customer” (KYC) requirements, similar to those used in the financial sector. Some legal experts and policymakers have proposed extending KYC principles to social media platforms, requiring them to verify the identity of users, particularly those engaged in commercial activities or with large followings. While such measures could help combat fraud, they also raise privacy concerns and could potentially limit anonymous speech online.
The legal system’s response to social media fraud also involves education and empowerment of consumers. Many jurisdictions have implemented laws requiring social media companies to provide clear and accessible information about their privacy policies, terms of service, and mechanisms for reporting fraudulent activities. For example, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) includes provisions mandating transparency and user control over personal data, which can help users make informed decisions and better protect themselves against fraud.
Another important aspect of the legal approach to social media fraud is the regulation of influencer marketing. As social media influencers have become powerful marketing channels, concerns have arisen about undisclosed sponsorships and misleading endorsements. The FTC has issued guidelines requiring clear disclosure of material connections between influencers and the products or services they promote, and has taken enforcement actions against both influencers and brands for deceptive practices.
The intersection of securities law and social media fraud presents unique challenges for the legal system. The rise of investment advice and stock promotion on social media platforms has led to concerns about market manipulation and fraud. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued guidance on the use of social media for corporate disclosures and has brought enforcement actions against individuals and companies for fraudulent investment schemes promoted on social media platforms.
The legal system must also address the role of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology in social media fraud. These technologies have been used both as tools for perpetrating fraud (e.g., cryptocurrency scams promoted on social media) and as potential solutions for enhancing trust and verification in online interactions. Regulatory bodies such as the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) are working to develop appropriate legal frameworks for cryptocurrency-related activities, including those that intersect with social media platforms.
One emerging area of legal focus is the concept of “digital identity” and its role in combating social media fraud. Some jurisdictions are exploring the development of secure, verifiable digital identity systems that could be used across various online platforms, including social media. While such systems could help reduce fraud and impersonation, they also raise complex legal and ethical questions about privacy, data ownership, and the right to anonymity online.
The legal system’s approach to social media fraud must also consider the global nature of these platforms and the potential for conflicting legal standards across jurisdictions. For example, the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) imposes new obligations on large online platforms to combat illegal content and disinformation, which could include certain forms of social media fraud. As different regions implement varying regulatory approaches, social media companies face the challenge of complying with a patchwork of legal requirements.
Another important legal consideration in addressing social media fraud is the potential liability of third-party service providers, such as payment processors or advertising networks, that may inadvertently facilitate fraudulent activities. Courts have grappled with questions of secondary liability in various contexts, and the extent to which these principles apply to social media fraud cases is still evolving.
The legal system’s response to social media fraud also intersects with broader efforts to combat cybercrime. Many of the techniques used in social media fraud, such as phishing or identity theft, are part of larger cybercriminal operations. Laws such as the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA) aim to improve information sharing between private companies and government agencies to better detect and prevent cyber threats, including those manifesting on social media platforms.
As the legal landscape continues to evolve, there is ongoing debate about the need for comprehensive federal legislation specifically addressing social media fraud. While existing laws provide some tools for combating these issues, proponents of new legislation argue that a more targeted approach is necessary to address the unique challenges posed by social media platforms.
In conclusion, the legal system’s approach to addressing fraudulent activities on social media is multifaceted and rapidly evolving. It involves a complex interplay of federal and state laws, regulatory actions, and judicial interpretations, all aimed at protecting consumers and maintaining the integrity of online interactions. As social media platforms continue to play an increasingly central role in commerce, communication, and public discourse, the legal framework for combating fraud in these spaces will undoubtedly continue to develop and adapt to new challenges.
Website citations used for this article:
Subscribe to Our Newsletter for Updates
About Attorneys.Media
Attorneys.Media is an innovative media platform designed to bridge the gap between legal professionals and the public. It leverages the power of video content to demystify complex legal topics, making it easier for individuals to understand various aspects of the law. By featuring interviews with lawyers who specialize in different fields, the platform provides valuable insights into both civil and criminal legal issues.
The business model of Attorneys.Media not only enhances public knowledge about legal matters but also offers attorneys a unique opportunity to showcase their expertise and connect with potential clients. The video interviews cover a broad spectrum of legal topics, offering viewers a deeper understanding of legal processes, rights, and considerations within different contexts.
For those seeking legal information, Attorneys.Media serves as a dynamic and accessible resource. The emphasis on video content caters to the growing preference for visual and auditory learning, making complex legal information more digestible for the general public.
Concurrently, for legal professionals, the platform provides a valuable avenue for visibility and engagement with a wider audience, potentially expanding their client base.
Uniquely, Attorneys.Media represents a modern approach to facilitating the education and knowledge of legal issues within the public sector and the subsequent legal consultation with local attorneys.