Identity theft has become an increasingly prevalent crime in the digital age, affecting millions of Americans each year. As a result, the United States has developed a comprehensive framework of identity theft laws to combat this growing threat and protect consumers. These laws operate at both the federal and state levels, providing a multi-layered approach to prevention, prosecution, and victim assistance.
At the federal level, the cornerstone of identity theft legislation is the Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998. This landmark law marked the first time that identity theft was officially recognized as a federal crime. It amended 18 U.S.C. § 1028 to make it illegal to knowingly transfer, possess, or use the identification of another person with the intent to commit or assist in any unlawful activity. This act was significant because it shifted the focus of the law to recognize the individual whose identity was stolen as the primary victim, rather than just the financial institutions that may have incurred losses.
The Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act also established the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) as the central federal agency responsible for receiving identity theft complaints and providing information to victims. This centralization of reporting has been crucial in tracking trends, developing prevention strategies, and assisting law enforcement in their investigations.
Building on this foundation, Congress passed the Identity Theft Penalty Enhancement Act in 2004. This law introduced the concept of “aggravated identity theft,” which applies when a person knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses the identity of another person during or in relation to specific felony violations. These include crimes such as immigration violations, theft of Social Security benefits, and acts of domestic terrorism. The act imposes a mandatory minimum sentence of two years in prison for aggravated identity theft, which must be served consecutively to any sentence for the underlying felony.
In 2008, the legal framework was further strengthened with the passage of the Identity Theft Enforcement and Restitution Act. This law expanded the ability of federal prosecutors to pursue identity theft cases by eliminating the requirement that the victim and perpetrator must be in different states. It also allowed for restitution orders to include compensation for the time victims spend repairing the damage caused by identity theft, recognizing the significant personal and financial burden that victims often face in resolving these issues.
The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), while not specifically an identity theft law, plays a crucial role in the prevention and mitigation of identity theft. The FCRA regulates the collection, dissemination, and use of consumer credit information. It provides consumers with the right to access their credit reports, dispute inaccuracies, and place fraud alerts on their files if they suspect they have been or are about to become victims of identity theft.
In 2003, the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) amended the FCRA to provide additional protections against identity theft. FACTA allows consumers to request and obtain a free credit report from each of the three major credit reporting agencies once every 12 months. It also requires businesses to take reasonable measures to protect sensitive consumer information and to properly dispose of consumer report information.
At the state level, all 50 states have enacted laws that criminalize identity theft. These laws often complement federal statutes and may provide additional protections or harsher penalties. For example, California’s Penal Code Section 530.5 makes it a crime to willfully obtain personal identifying information of another person and use it for any unlawful purpose. This state law allows for penalties of up to three years in prison and substantial fines.
Many states have also implemented laws requiring businesses and government agencies to notify individuals when their personal information has been compromised in a data breach. These data breach notification laws vary by state but generally require timely notification to affected individuals and, in some cases, to state authorities or credit reporting agencies.
The legal landscape of identity theft prevention and prosecution continues to evolve as new technologies and methods of identity theft emerge. For instance, the rise of synthetic identity theft, where criminals combine real and fake information to create new identities, has prompted discussions about updating existing laws to address this sophisticated form of fraud.
One of the challenges in enforcing identity theft laws is the often cross-jurisdictional nature of the crime. Identity thieves may operate across state lines or even internationally, complicating investigations and prosecutions. To address this, federal agencies such as the FBI and Secret Service often collaborate with state and local law enforcement in task forces dedicated to combating identity theft and related cybercrimes.
The Electronic Funds Transfer Act (EFTA) and its implementing regulation, Regulation E, also play a role in protecting consumers from identity theft related to electronic banking transactions. These regulations limit consumer liability for unauthorized electronic fund transfers, provided the consumer reports the unauthorized activity in a timely manner.
In recent years, there has been an increased focus on protecting children from identity theft. The Child Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) regulates the collection of personal information from children under 13 years old online. While not specifically an identity theft law, COPPA helps reduce the risk of children’s personal information being exposed and potentially misused.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) is another piece of legislation that, while not exclusively focused on identity theft, contains provisions that help protect consumers’ financial information. The GLBA requires financial institutions to explain their information-sharing practices to customers and to safeguard sensitive data.
As identity theft techniques become more sophisticated, lawmakers continue to propose new legislation to address emerging threats. For example, there have been discussions about creating national standards for data security and breach notification to replace the current patchwork of state laws. Such standardization could potentially make it easier for businesses to comply with regulations and for consumers to understand their rights regardless of where they live.
The enforcement of identity theft laws involves a complex interplay between various federal and state agencies. At the federal level, the Department of Justice (DOJ) is responsible for prosecuting identity theft cases. The DOJ works closely with other agencies such as the FTC, FBI, Secret Service, and U.S. Postal Inspection Service to investigate and build cases against identity thieves.
The FTC, in addition to its role in receiving complaints and providing information, also enforces the Red Flags Rule. This rule requires certain businesses and organizations to implement a written identity theft prevention program designed to detect the warning signs – or “red flags” – of identity theft in their day-to-day operations.
State attorneys general also play a crucial role in enforcing identity theft laws and protecting consumers. Many states have dedicated units within their attorney general’s offices that focus on identity theft and consumer protection issues. These units often work on public education initiatives, investigate complaints, and pursue legal action against violators of state identity theft laws.
One area where identity theft laws have been particularly important is in the healthcare sector. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) includes provisions to protect patients’ medical information from unauthorized access or disclosure. While HIPAA is not specifically an identity theft law, its privacy and security rules help prevent medical identity theft, a form of fraud where someone uses another person’s identity to obtain medical services or prescription drugs.
The rise of social media and the increasing amount of personal information shared online has created new challenges for identity theft prevention. While there are no federal laws specifically addressing identity theft via social media platforms, existing laws can be applied to these cases. Additionally, many social media companies have implemented their own policies and safeguards to protect users’ information and prevent impersonation.
Another emerging area of concern is the use of biometric data for identification purposes. As more companies and government agencies collect and use biometric information such as fingerprints, facial recognition data, and DNA profiles, there is growing discussion about the need for specific laws to protect this highly sensitive personal data from theft or misuse.
The Real ID Act, while primarily focused on establishing minimum security standards for state-issued driver’s licenses and identification cards, also plays a role in identity theft prevention. By requiring more stringent proof of identity to obtain these documents, the Act aims to make it more difficult for identity thieves to obtain fraudulent identification.
In the financial sector, the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and related anti-money laundering (AML) regulations require financial institutions to implement customer identification programs and report suspicious activities. These measures help prevent identity thieves from using stolen information to open bank accounts or conduct financial transactions.
The legal framework for addressing identity theft also includes provisions for victim assistance and recovery. The Crime Victims’ Rights Act ensures that victims of federal crimes, including identity theft, have certain rights in the criminal justice process. These rights include the right to be reasonably protected from the accused, to be notified of court proceedings, and to be heard at public proceedings in the district court involving release, plea, sentencing, or parole.
Many states have also implemented their own victim assistance programs. These programs may offer services such as help with filing police reports, contacting creditors, and navigating the process of clearing fraudulent accounts or charges.
As technology continues to advance, new forms of identity theft are likely to emerge, necessitating ongoing updates to the legal framework. For example, the increasing use of Internet of Things (IoT) devices raises questions about how to protect the vast amounts of personal data these devices collect and transmit.
The global nature of the internet and digital commerce also presents challenges for enforcing identity theft laws. While U.S. laws primarily focus on protecting American consumers, identity theft often transcends national borders. This has led to increased international cooperation in law enforcement efforts and discussions about harmonizing identity theft laws across countries.
In conclusion, the United States has developed a comprehensive set of laws to combat identity theft, operating at both the federal and state levels. These laws criminalize various forms of identity theft, provide tools for prevention and detection, establish rights for victims, and impose obligations on businesses to protect consumer information. As the nature of identity theft continues to evolve with technological advancements, it is likely that these laws will continue to be updated and expanded to address new threats and protect consumers in an increasingly digital world.
Sources:
https://www.myfloridalegal.com/identity-theft/federal-id-theft-law
https://www.egattorneys.com/federal-identity-theft
https://www.justia.com/consumer/identity-theft/
https://ovc.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh226/files/pubs/ID_theft/victimsrights.html
https://ovc.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh226/files/pubs/ID_theft/idtheftlaws.html
https://www.isaca.org/resources/news-and-trends/industry-news/2021/understanding-the-importance-of-us-privacy-and-identity-theft-laws
https://www.findlaw.com/consumer/online-scams/the-identity-theft-enforcement-and-restitution-act.html
English 
Español de México