Legal Marketing Blog | Expert Insights for Attorneys | Attorneys.Media Resource - Page 346

Limits in Administrative Law

Administrative Law Constitutional Law

Agency discretion limits under arbitrary and capricious review

November 20, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

Under the APA, courts set aside agency actions that are “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law” (5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A)). Agencies must show a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made, consider relevant factors, and explain departures from prior policy. This article outlines how that […]

Rigorous Review in Action

Administrative Law Constitutional Law

The hard look doctrine’s role in arbitrary and capricious determinations

November 20, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

Under the APA, courts apply the hard look doctrine to enforce the “arbitrary and capricious” standard by requiring agencies to give a reasoned explanation grounded in the record. If an agency ignores important factors, contradicts evidence, or fails to address alternatives, the action can be set aside. This article explains the doctrine’s origins, how courts […]

Strategies Against Capricious Rules

Administrative Law Constitutional Law

How to challenge agency rulemaking as arbitrary and capricious

November 20, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

Under the APA, courts will set aside an agency rule as “arbitrary and capricious” if the agency failed to give a reasoned explanation or ignored key evidence in the record. A successful challenge typically shows the rule conflicts with the statute, relies on improper factors, or fails to address important comments. This article explains the […]

Understanding Arbitrary Review Types

Administrative Law Constitutional Law

Procedural vs. substantive arbitrary and capricious review: What’s the difference?

November 20, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

Procedural arbitrary and capricious review targets flaws in the agency’s decisionmaking process (e.g., ignored comments or inadequate explanation), while substantive review targets the reasonableness of the outcome based on the record. Both apply under the APA’s “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion” standard in 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). This article explains the differences, key cases, […]

Capricious Rulings in Focus

Administrative Law Constitutional Law

Circuit court interpretations: Analyzing arbitrary and capricious rulings

November 19, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

The APA’s “arbitrary and capricious” standard appears in 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A) and requires agencies to show a reasoned explanation grounded in the record. Circuit courts apply it by checking whether the agency considered relevant factors and explained departures from prior policy without ignoring key evidence. This article compares major circuit approaches and what they […]

Jonestown Tragedy Legal Insights

Child Protection Civil Rights

Jim Jones and Jonestown: The Legal Implications of a Mass Tragedy

November 19, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

The Jonestown tragedy killed 918 people in 1978, raising enduring questions about criminal accountability and civil liability. It also exposed gaps in oversight of religious groups, child welfare protections, and responses to coercive control. This article outlines the key legal implications, potential claims, and policy reforms tied to mass-casualty cult violence. The Jonestown massacre, orchestrated […]

Law Firm Pr Campaign Highlights

Legal Advice and Consultation Legal Commentary

What are examples of successful proactive PR campaigns for law firms?

November 19, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

Successful proactive PR campaigns for law firms typically include 5 proven plays: thought-leadership bylines, newsjacking media outreach, data-driven reports, award/ranking PR, and community-impact initiatives. These campaigns build credibility, generate earned media, and position attorneys as go-to experts in specific practice areas. This article breaks down real-world examples, what made them work, and how to replicate […]

Supreme Court's Impact on Legal Standards

Administrative Law Constitutional Law

Landmark Supreme Court cases shaping the arbitrary and capricious standard

November 19, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

The Supreme Court has shaped the arbitrary and capricious standard through at least 5 major decisions, including Overton Park, State Farm, Chevron, Fox Television, and Encino Motorcars. These cases require agencies to offer reasoned explanations and consider relevant factors under the Administrative Procedure Act. This article summarizes each ruling’s rule and its practical impact on […]

Arbitrary Vs Substantial in Law

Administrative Law Constitutional Law

Arbitrary and capricious vs. substantial evidence: Key differences explained

November 19, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

The key difference is that “arbitrary and capricious” is a deferential reasoned-decisionmaking check, while “substantial evidence” requires enough record support that a reasonable mind could accept. Arbitrary-and-capricious review focuses on the agency’s explanation; substantial-evidence review focuses on evidentiary support in the administrative record. This article explains when each standard applies and how courts evaluate agency […]

Preventing Business Conflicts with Review

Business Law Civil Litigation

Can a Business Contract Review Help Prevent Future Disputes?

November 18, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

Yes—contract review can cut dispute risk by identifying ambiguous terms and compliance gaps before signing, reducing costly litigation later. An attorney can clarify duties, deadlines, payment terms, remedies, and dispute-resolution clauses to align expectations. This article explains how business contract review prevents disputes and what to examine in key provisions. In the complex world of […]

Understanding Judicial Review Standards

Administrative Law Constitutional Law

What level of deference do courts provide to agency decisions under the arbitrary and capricious standard?

November 18, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

Under the arbitrary and capricious standard, courts apply a deferential review and will uphold an agency action if it shows a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made. Courts do not substitute their judgment, but they will set aside decisions lacking reasoned explanation, ignoring key evidence, or violating law. This article explains […]

Tech Giants Under Antitrust Scrutiny

Civil Litigation Consumer Protection

What are the latest developments in antitrust litigation involving major tech companies like Apple?

November 18, 2024 • By Jack Gilbert

As of 2024–2025, Apple faces at least two major antitrust fronts: the U.S. DOJ’s March 2024 monopolization lawsuit and EU enforcement actions under the Digital Markets Act. These cases target App Store policies like steering limits, default settings, and platform access, with potential remedies ranging from rule changes to structural relief. This article summarizes the […]

← Previous 1 … 344 345 346 347 348 … 457 Next →