Legal Procedures

Explore a comprehensive range of content focused on essential legal procedures, including detailed explanations of court processes, filing techniques, and case management strategies. Visitors will find informative articles, video interviews with experienced attorneys, and practical resources designed to demystify the legal system. Whether you are seeking guidance on civil litigation, criminal defense, or family law matters, our curated materials provide valuable insights to help you navigate legal challenges effectively.

854 posts
How to challenge agency rulemaking as arbitrary and capricious

How to challenge agency rulemaking as arbitrary and capricious

Under the APA, courts will set aside an agency rule as “arbitrary and capricious” if the agency failed to give a reasoned explanation or ignored key evidence in the record. A successful challenge typically shows the rule conflicts with the statute, relies on improper factors, or fails to address important comments. This article explains the […]
Read More
Procedural vs. substantive arbitrary and capricious review: What’s the difference?

Procedural vs. substantive arbitrary and capricious review: What’s the difference?

Procedural arbitrary and capricious review targets flaws in the agency’s decisionmaking process (e.g., ignored comments or inadequate explanation), while substantive review targets the reasonableness of the outcome based on the record. Both apply under the APA’s “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion” standard in 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). This article explains the differences, key cases, […]
Read More
Circuit court interpretations: Analyzing arbitrary and capricious rulings

Circuit court interpretations: Analyzing arbitrary and capricious rulings

The APA’s “arbitrary and capricious” standard appears in 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A) and requires agencies to show a reasoned explanation grounded in the record. Circuit courts apply it by checking whether the agency considered relevant factors and explained departures from prior policy without ignoring key evidence. This article compares major circuit approaches and what they […]
Read More
Jim Jones and Jonestown: The Legal Implications of a Mass Tragedy

Jim Jones and Jonestown: The Legal Implications of a Mass Tragedy

The Jonestown tragedy killed 918 people in 1978, raising enduring questions about criminal accountability and civil liability. It also exposed gaps in oversight of religious groups, child welfare protections, and responses to coercive control. This article outlines the key legal implications, potential claims, and policy reforms tied to mass-casualty cult violence. The Jonestown massacre, orchestrated […]
Read More
What are examples of successful proactive PR campaigns for law firms?

What are examples of successful proactive PR campaigns for law firms?

Successful proactive PR campaigns for law firms typically include 5 proven plays: thought-leadership bylines, newsjacking media outreach, data-driven reports, award/ranking PR, and community-impact initiatives. These campaigns build credibility, generate earned media, and position attorneys as go-to experts in specific practice areas. This article breaks down real-world examples, what made them work, and how to replicate […]
Read More
Landmark Supreme Court cases shaping the arbitrary and capricious standard

Landmark Supreme Court cases shaping the arbitrary and capricious standard

The Supreme Court has shaped the arbitrary and capricious standard through at least 5 major decisions, including Overton Park, State Farm, Chevron, Fox Television, and Encino Motorcars. These cases require agencies to offer reasoned explanations and consider relevant factors under the Administrative Procedure Act. This article summarizes each ruling’s rule and its practical impact on […]
Read More
Arbitrary and capricious vs. substantial evidence: Key differences explained

Arbitrary and capricious vs. substantial evidence: Key differences explained

The key difference is that “arbitrary and capricious” is a deferential reasoned-decisionmaking check, while “substantial evidence” requires enough record support that a reasonable mind could accept. Arbitrary-and-capricious review focuses on the agency’s explanation; substantial-evidence review focuses on evidentiary support in the administrative record. This article explains when each standard applies and how courts evaluate agency […]
Read More
What level of deference do courts provide to agency decisions under the arbitrary and capricious standard?

What level of deference do courts provide to agency decisions under the arbitrary and capricious standard?

Under the arbitrary and capricious standard, courts apply a deferential review and will uphold an agency action if it shows a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made. Courts do not substitute their judgment, but they will set aside decisions lacking reasoned explanation, ignoring key evidence, or violating law. This article explains […]
Read More
What are the latest developments in antitrust litigation involving major tech companies like Apple?

What are the latest developments in antitrust litigation involving major tech companies like Apple?

As of 2024–2025, Apple faces at least two major antitrust fronts: the U.S. DOJ’s March 2024 monopolization lawsuit and EU enforcement actions under the Digital Markets Act. These cases target App Store policies like steering limits, default settings, and platform access, with potential remedies ranging from rule changes to structural relief. This article summarizes the […]
Read More
How is artificial intelligence impacting legal practices, particularly in IP litigation and labor relations?

How is artificial intelligence impacting legal practices, particularly in IP litigation and labor relations?

AI is impacting legal practices by cutting document review and legal research time by up to 60% in many matters. In IP litigation it improves prior art searches, claim mapping, and eDiscovery, while in labor relations it supports contract analysis, compliance monitoring, and dispute triage but raises bias and confidentiality issues. This article explains the […]
Read More
How often should a company review its data privacy compliance?

How often should a company review its data privacy compliance?

Most companies should review data privacy compliance at least annually, and immediately after major business or regulatory changes. Frequent reviews reduce breach risk, catch gaps in vendor and internal practices, and help maintain required documentation for laws like the GDPR and CCPA/CPRA. This article explains recommended review schedules, key triggers for off-cycle audits, and practical […]
Read More
What technology do I need for an effective online legal consultation?

What technology do I need for an effective online legal consultation?

You need a reliable internet connection, a device with a camera and microphone, and a secure video platform to have an effective online legal consultation. Using updated software, a quiet private space, and a way to share documents (like PDF scans or a secure client portal) helps your attorney review facts quickly and protect confidentiality. […]
Read More
Scroll to Top