Constitutional Law

Explore a comprehensive collection of resources dedicated to understanding the intricacies of constitutional law. Visitors will find informative articles, in-depth video interviews with legal experts, and clear definitions of key terms, all designed to deepen your knowledge of individual rights, governmental powers, and landmark Supreme Court cases. Whether you're a legal professional or someone seeking clarity on constitutional issues, this category provides authoritative insights and guidance.

447 posts
Jury Nullification: When Juries Ignore the Law

Jury Nullification: When Juries Ignore the Law

Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a not guilty verdict even though the prosecution proved guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It’s not a formal legal right jurors are told about, but it can happen because juries generally can’t be punished for verdicts. This article explains what it is, its historical use, and key legal […]
Read More
What procedural steps must agencies follow to prevent arbitrary decisions?

What procedural steps must agencies follow to prevent arbitrary decisions?

Agencies can avoid arbitrary decisions by following mandated procedures such as notice-and-comment rulemaking, building an evidence-based administrative record, and issuing reasoned explanations grounded in statutory authority. Courts commonly review whether the agency considered relevant factors, addressed significant comments, and explained any policy change without ignoring facts. This article outlines the key procedural requirements, recordkeeping practices, […]
Read More
Bail Jumping: Consequences of Missing Court Dates

Bail Jumping: Consequences of Missing Court Dates

Missing a court date can trigger bail jumping charges, a bench warrant, and even jail time, with penalties varying by jurisdiction and whether the underlying case is a misdemeanor or felony. Courts may also revoke bail, forfeit bond money, and impose stricter release conditions going forward. This article explains what qualifies as bail jumping, the […]
Read More
Malicious Prosecution: Legal Recourse for Wrongful Charges

Malicious Prosecution: Legal Recourse for Wrongful Charges

Malicious prosecution claims let you sue for damages when someone initiates criminal or civil proceedings against you without probable cause and with malice, and the case ends in your favor. These lawsuits can recover losses such as legal fees, lost income, reputational harm, and emotional distress, but they require specific proof and are often time-limited. […]
Read More
Retroactive Laws: When New Rules Apply to Past Crimes

Retroactive Laws: When New Rules Apply to Past Crimes

Retroactive criminal laws are generally unconstitutional in the U.S. under the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clauses, which prohibit new laws that increase punishment or criminalize past conduct. However, retroactivity questions still arise through court rulings, procedural changes, sentencing amendments, and civil or regulatory schemes that may affect prior acts. This article explains what counts as […]
Read More
Probable Cause: Standard for Arrests and Searches

Probable Cause: Standard for Arrests and Searches

Probable cause requires facts that would lead a reasonable person to believe a crime occurred or evidence will be found, allowing a warrant or certain warrantless action. It is the Fourth Amendment threshold for lawful arrests, searches, and seizures and is more than a hunch but less than proof beyond a reasonable doubt. This article […]
Read More

Probable Cause: Standard for Arrests and Searches

Probable cause requires specific facts that would lead a reasonable person to believe a crime occurred or evidence will be found. Courts assess the totality of the circumstances, including officer observations, witness tips, and reliability. This article explains probable cause for arrests and searches, warrants, exceptions, and how challenges work.
Read More
Diminished Capacity Defense: Partial Responsibility for Crimes

Diminished Capacity Defense: Partial Responsibility for Crimes

The diminished capacity defense can reduce a charge by showing a defendant lacked the specific intent required for the offense due to a mental impairment. It is not the same as insanity and typically applies only to specific-intent crimes, depending on state law and admissible expert evidence. This article explains how it works, when it […]
Read More
Exclusionary Rule: Keeping Illegal Evidence Out of Court

Exclusionary Rule: Keeping Illegal Evidence Out of Court

The exclusionary rule generally bars evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment from being used in a criminal trial. Courts apply it to deter unlawful searches and seizures, but allow exceptions like good faith, inevitable discovery, and independent source. This article explains what the rule is, when it applies, and the main exceptions. The […]
Read More
Presumption of Innocence: Cornerstone of Criminal Justice

Presumption of Innocence: Cornerstone of Criminal Justice

In U.S. criminal courts, the presumption of innocence requires the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This rule places the burden of proof on the government and protects defendants from conviction based on accusation alone. This article explains the doctrine’s constitutional roots, how it works at trial, and key limits and exceptions. The […]
Read More
Labor law decisions and the arbitrary and capricious standard

Labor law decisions and the arbitrary and capricious standard

Under APA review, a labor law decision is overturned only if it is “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law” (5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A)). Courts generally defer to agencies like the NLRB when they explain their reasoning and rely on record evidence. This article explains how the standard applies […]
Read More
Factors Courts Consider in Arbitrary and Capricious Decisions

Factors Courts Consider in Arbitrary and Capricious Decisions

Courts commonly assess 5 core factors under the arbitrary and capricious standard: reasoned explanation, consideration of relevant factors, evidentiary support, consistency with prior policy, and legal compliance. If an agency ignored key evidence or failed to explain its choice, courts may set the action aside under the APA. This article outlines each factor and how […]
Read More
Scroll to Top