trial objections

How to Prove AI-Generated Deepfake Evidence Is Inadmissible Under the Federal Rules of Evidence (2026)

How to Prove AI-Generated Deepfake Evidence Is Inadmissible Under the Federal Rules of Evidence (2026)

Courts can exclude AI deepfakes under at least 5 core Federal Rules of Evidence—401/402, 403, 901, 702, and 802—when authenticity, reliability, or prejudice can’t be cured. As synthetic media gets easier to create, litigators must be ready to attack manipulated audio, video, images, and “AI transcripts” before they shape the factfinder’s view. This article explains […]

How to Prove AI-Generated Deepfake Evidence Is Inadmissible Under the Federal Rules of Evidence (2026) Read More »

Gavel beside a glowing AI digital screen in court

How to Challenge an Opponent’s AI-Generated Evidence in California State Court (2026 Guide)

Challenging AI-generated evidence in California state court typically requires 5 moves: early preservation demands, targeted discovery, authentication objections, expert-driven reliability attacks, and tailored motions in limine. California’s Evidence Code and Civil Discovery Act already provide strong tools to expose how a model produced (or fabricated) an output. This guide explains practical objections, discovery requests, expert

How to Challenge an Opponent’s AI-Generated Evidence in California State Court (2026 Guide) Read More »

Scroll to Top