In a surprising turn of events, the highly anticipated Supreme Court case involving Meta, formerly known as Facebook, has come to an abrupt end with the unexpected withdrawal of the case before a ruling could be issued. This development has sent shockwaves through the legal community and tech industry, raising questions about the future of […]
Meta Case at Supreme Court: Unexpected Withdrawal Without Ruling Read More »
Facing a DUI charge can be a daunting experience, but it’s crucial to understand that an arrest doesn’t automatically lead to a conviction. With the right defense strategies, you can effectively fight a drunk driving charge and potentially avoid severe consequences. This article will explore various tactics and legal approaches that can be employed to
DUI Defense Strategies: How to Fight a Drunk Driving Charge Read More »
In a landmark decision that has sent ripples through the tech industry, a federal jury has awarded Netlist Inc. $118 million in damages in a patent infringement lawsuit against Samsung Electronics Co. This verdict marks a significant victory for Netlist, a small California-based technology company, against one of the world’s largest electronics manufacturers. The case
Samsung Patent Infringement: Jury Awards Netlist $118M in Lawsuit Read More »
The future of the Supreme Court bar is taking shape, with rising stars like Morgan Ratner of Sullivan & Cromwell at the forefront of this evolution. As the landscape of Supreme Court advocacy continues to shift, Ratner’s ascent highlights the changing dynamics within this elite group of legal professionals. Her work at Sullivan & Cromwell,
Supreme Court Bar Future: Sullivan & Cromwell’s Morgan Ratner in Spotlight Read More »
Miranda rights are a fundamental aspect of the American criminal justice system, serving as a crucial safeguard for individuals who find themselves in police custody. These rights, derived from the landmark 1966 Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona, are designed to protect suspects from self-incrimination during police interrogations. Despite their prominence in popular culture, many
Understanding Miranda Rights: What They Mean for Your Case Read More »
In a landmark development for environmental litigation, attorneys have secured substantial settlements totaling $95.8 million from Tyco and BASF in the ongoing PFAS foam litigation. This significant legal victory marks a crucial step forward in addressing the widespread contamination caused by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often referred to as “forever chemicals” due to their
PFAS Foam Litigation: Attorneys Secure $95.8M in Tyco, BASF Settlements Read More »
In a surprising turn of events, X Corp., the company behind the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, has entered the legal fray surrounding the bankruptcy sale of InfoWars, opposing the transfer of associated social media accounts. This development adds a new layer of complexity to an already contentious case involving digital asset ownership
InfoWars Social Media Accounts: X Corp. Opposes Sale in Legal Battle Read More »
The legal industry is abuzz with the latest developments in associate compensation as more top law firms announce their year-end bonuses, matching the scale set by Milbank earlier this month. This trend highlights the ongoing competition for legal talent and the strategies employed by firms to retain their top performers in a dynamic market. The
Law Firm Bonuses: More Firms Match Milbank’s Scale in Competitive Market Read More »
In a landmark decision that has sent shockwaves through the biotech industry, a federal court jury has unanimously ruled in favor of Guardant Health in its false advertising lawsuit against Natera, awarding a staggering $292.5 million in damages. This verdict, which includes $175.5 million in punitive damages, represents one of the largest false advertising judgments
Natera vs. Guardant: Jury Awards $292.5M in False Advertising Lawsuit Read More »
In a surprising turn of events, Special Counsel Jack Smith has made the decision to drop several federal cases against former President Donald Trump, sending shockwaves through the legal and political landscapes. This unexpected move has raised questions about the strength of the evidence, the strategic considerations behind the decision, and the potential implications for
Trump Federal Cases Dropped: Special Counsel Jack Smith’s Decision Explained Read More »
